Saturday, August 27, 2016 Wikileaks is a Front for Russian Intelligence

Mod: This isn't that big of a secret, but somehow the corporate media just can't put its fat finger on it. And among the many really big failures in this most awful of presidential campaigns, this has to rank among the largest. First, here is that failure (link).

Mod: While it is interesting that Assange mentions Trump's big stupid mouth (how could he not?), that isn't the real reason why he refuses to release any bad news regarding the Kremlin's clear choice in our election. Rather Trump really is that choice, and those pulling Assange's strings would obviously be displeased were he to slam the candidate they are so obviously working for. Here's why:

Mod: You can read the rest here. And yes, there is always more.

Mod: It is interesting to note that many Trump supporters actually hope the Russian controlled Wikileaks will somehow bail Donald Trump out. Including some who post here. You have to wonder if these self-styled so-called "patriots" understand that they are merely dupes in a strategy being run by Russian intelligence. 

Link to the above article here.

Friday, August 26, 2016

Apparently Donald Trump Isn't Going To Build That Wall After All ... Which I Guess Means Mexico Won't Have To Pay For It

After having endlessly claimed that he was going to build a wall to keep Mexicans out of the United States, Donald Trump has now flip-flopped on it. As a matter of fact, Donald has now flipped on that entire issue. This has upset quite a few of his supporters, but none quite so much as the excitable individual appearing in this following video.

Video link here.

Attempts by the Trump campaign to explain this sudden reversal on his signature issue are as stupid and ridiculous as just about everything else they come up with. But none is so laughably idiotic as the following found on a news site called Mediaite (link).

The most delicious part of the whole fiasco is what this has done to Ann Coulter. She was just about to go on tour behind her new book praising Donald Trump, but after this how can she? Here is how Ann showed her disappointment yesterday.

The Clinton campaign has a new ad out and it is devastating

We don't get to see much in the way of national political advertising here in California because the results are pretty much a foregone conclusion. But this one should hit pretty hard in the battleground states.

Link here.

This certainly has been an interesting political year so far. I hope you're having as much fun as I am.

Thursday, August 25, 2016

Los Angeles Times: Hillary Clinton takes aim at Donald Trump's ties to 'alt right' world of radical conservatives

For the rest of this article click here.

Ann Coulter goes off on Trump for flip flopping on immigration

Oh dear. Ann Coulter is not happy with The Donald. Click here for all of the pain.

Wednesday, August 24, 2016

Whatever The Trump People Are Doing, It Isn't Working

Are a lot of Trump on-line supporters actually from Russia?

Rent Control Donald Style

One More

Monday, August 22, 2016

Edison and San Onofre Nuclear Power Plant

Mod: If you ever look at all of the mishmash of costly numbers located at the upper right hand corner of your Edison electric bill, you will notice something there called "nuclear decommissioning charges." This is the cash that gets taken from you to pay for the Edison's catastrophic failures at the San Onofre nuclear power plant. A radioactive mess that will somehow have to be contained for a few centuries. Talk about a gift to future generations. To add insult to injury, according to the Los Angeles Times today, those decommissioning charges that you are so generously paying for might not have been assigned to you in the most aboveboard kind of way. And yes, I am sure you are surprised to hear this.

A tainted settlement on San Onofre closing costs

After the San Onofre nuclear plant shut down unexpectedly in early 2012, regulators approved a deal dividing up the $4.7 billion in closing costs.

The terms of the settlement were worked out by Southern California Edison, which owns 78% of the plant, in negotiation with San Diego Gas & Electric, consumer advocates and environmentalists. They decided that ratepayers would be responsible for most of the bill — $3.3 billion, minus various credits — while the two utilities’ shareholders would pay the rest.

That apparently seemed reasonable to most of the parties at the time, although consumer groups initially wanted investors to pay more of the costs and some smaller stakeholder groups did not agree to the final deal. But the agreement avoided a protracted litigation process that consumer advocates worried could result in a worse outcome for ratepayers if it was influenced by then-PUC President Michael Peevey, a former chief of Edison, who some suspected was not on the side of customers.

That deal seems a lot less reasonable now, in light of troubling information that has emerged since about secret meetings to discuss how costs should be allocated between Peevey and Stephen Pickett, who was then Edison’s executive vice president for external relations. The meetings were held during the year before the deal was made.

Consumer advocates say they might have rejected the settlement terms and pushed harder for utility shareholders to cover more of the cost of decommissioning if they knew at the time about the meetings, which they say gave an unfair negotiating advantage to Edison at the expense of ratepayers. The PUC in May agreed to reopen the settlement and consider whether it ought to be changed.

The secret meetings occurred in March 2013, after the replacement steam generators failed, forcing the plant to close — but before Edison had decided to shut down the plan for good. Peevey and Pickett were both at an energy industry conference in Warsaw at the time. The notes from that meeting, on hotel stationery, appear to lay out possible ways to allocate the costs associated with shutting down the nuclear plant.

Mod: You can read the rest here.

Sunday, August 21, 2016

A Man Who Says God Punishes Gays with Natural Disasters Had His Home Destroyed in the Flood

Mod: Interesting Sunday reading from Esquire Magazine - link.

Tony Perkins, who has made a career railing against LGBT people-including saying that God sends natural disasters to punish them-just had his house destroyed by a natural disaster.

Perkins is president of the Family Research Council, which the Southern Poverty Law Center classifies as an anti-gay extremist hate group. Tony Perkins also lives in Louisiana, where there's been massive flooding this week that has killed 13 people and destroyed thousands of homes-including Tony Perkins'.

"This is a flood, I would have to say, of near biblical proportions," Perkins said, adding that he's now living off "God's provisions."

Here, via SPLC, are some other quotes from Tony Perkins.

"While activists like to claim that pedophilia is a completely distinct orientation from homosexuality, evidence shows a disproportionate overlap between the two. … It is a homosexual problem."

"The videos are titled 'It Gets Better.' They are aimed at persuading kids that although they'll face struggles and perhaps bullying for 'coming out' as homosexual (or transgendered or some other perversion), life will get better. … It's disgusting. And it's part of a concerted effort to persuade kids that homosexuality is okay and actually to recruit them into that lifestyle."

"Those who understand the homosexual community-the activists-they're very aggressive, they're-everything they accuse us of they are in triplicate. They're intolerant, they're hateful, vile, they're spiteful. .... To me, that is the height of hatred, to be silent when we know there are individuals that are engaged in activity, behavior, and an agenda that will destroy them and our nation."

And, in a 2015 interview, he agreed with extremist Messianic Jewish pastor Jonathan Cahn that Hurricane Joaquin was a "sign of God's wrath" over the legalization of gay marriage and abortion, saying: "God is trying to send us a message."

Was God trying to "send" Tony Perkins a message this week? Or was He trying to "send" Ted Cruz a message, who appointed Perkins to his failed presidential campaign's "advisory council for religious liberty?"

Or was He trying to "send" the Republican National Committee a message? After all, they allowed Perkins to play a decisive role in crafting the Republican Party platform last month, including a fun little provision that advocated for sending LGBT people to gay conversion therapy-a thoroughly debunked and possibly destructive method of "treatment."

Or is Perkins just a normal person, like LGBT people, who now has to overcome adversity?

Saturday, August 20, 2016

Letter to the Sierra Madre Weekly that needs comment

I have no idea what happened, nor do I really care all that much. But there is something about this that is kind of disturbing.

Dear Editor:

In response to ‘Mind Your Manners, Good Folk!” – Aug. 11 Letters – The coward whose name was withheld by request, get your facts straight before you make unsubstantiated allegations and think you were one inconvenienced by the “rude and boorish behavior of the two ladies …”

You say they “apparently arrived a few minutes before the concert and proceeded to neatly fold and set aside” your blankets. Did you see them do this? Did anyone see them do this? No!

Because I personally set up my mother and her friend’s chairs on Saturday evening ( without moving or folding and blankets or chairs.)

These two “rude and boorish” ladies happen to be Matriachs in this great city, residing here since 1950s, raising their families of six and eight children, attending St. Rita’s Church every Sunday and sacrificing many hours ( years) of dedicated service for many community events.

Yup, Sir (and I say this reluctantly), are the one who should be ashamed for your rude and boorish behavior by harassing and threatening them.

As for your ethical guidelines and responsible citizen remarks, perhaps you should take a look in the mirror and ask yourself if it’s appropriate to verbally abuse two very fine, morally upstanding women in their mid-80’s- with no basis whatsoever.

Could you imagine if people actually got as upset about unfair and dishonest taxation schemes or crumbling infrastructure as some do when squabbling over blanket placement at a Memorial Park concert?

Friday, August 19, 2016

New York Daily News Video of Naked Donald Trump Statue Being Removed From Union Square (Graphic)

Link here

The New York City Parks Department Explains

Trump advisers waged covert influence campaign (link)

WASHINGTON (AP) — A firm run by Donald Trump's campaign chairman directly orchestrated a covert Washington lobbying operation on behalf of Ukraine's ruling political party, attempting to sway American public opinion in favor of the country's pro-Russian government, emails obtained by The Associated Press show. Paul Manafort and his deputy, Rick Gates, never disclosed their work as foreign agents as required under federal law. 

The lobbying included attempts to gain positive press coverage of Ukrainian officials in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and The Associated Press. Another goal: undercutting American public sympathy for the imprisoned rival of Ukraine's then-president. At the time, European and American leaders were pressuring Ukraine to free her. 

Gates personally directed the work of two prominent Washington lobbying firms in the matter, the emails show. He worked for Manafort's political consulting firm at the time. 

Manafort and Gates' activities carry outsized importance, since they have steered Trump's campaign since April. The pair also played a formative role building out Trump's campaign operation after pushing out an early rival. Trump shook up his campaign's organization again this week, but Manafort and Gates retain their titles and much of their influence. The new disclosures about their work come as Trump faces criticism for his friendly overtures to Russian President Vladimir Putin 

Thursday, August 18, 2016

Trump's Latest New Campaign Manager - Breitbart News Head Stephen Bannon - Is A Certifiable Wacko

The New York Daily News has a great article up this morning called "Trump not crazy enough for you? Here are five ideas spread by the site run by the mogul’s new campaign CEO" (link). The website referred to is Breitbart, and it is just about as far to the right as you can get these days.

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has hired Breitbart News executive chairman Stephen Bannon as his new campaign chief executive. Here are a few of the ways the Daily News describes the kinds of unpleasant and conspiratorial things advocated for by Mr. Bannon, this week's latest flavor of the week guy hired by Donald Trump to run his campaign.

White Supremacist LeaningsBreitbart News has often been accused of spreading the same race-baiting diatribes and thinly veiled white nationalist leanings as Trump himself. Much of those have been written by controversial columnist Milo Yiannopoulos, who has frequently littered the internet with overtly racist and hateful statements. In March he penned a comprehensive defense of his opinions and theories, many of which have been deemed by the Southern Poverty Law Center as evidence of a "a noticeable shift toward embracing ideas on the extremist fringe of the conservative right."

Anti-gay RhetoricIn the same vein, Breitbart News has been accused of pushing anti-gay bigotry and has even given a mouthpiece to anti-LGBTQ hate group leaders like Austin Ruse. Ruse's faction, the Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute (C-FAM), has been labeled a hate group by the SPLC. Ruse, for example, has written on Breitbart about hateful conspiracy theories surrounding the tragic death of Matthew Shepard, who was beaten and tortured in a brutal hate crime in Wyoming in 1998.

Trump reportedly paid for good coverageIn addition to spewing pro-Trump odes and anti-Clinton conspiracies, Breitbart News actually took money from the bigoted billionaire — a sinister exchange that has cast a wide shadow over the site's credibility. "The company's top management was allowing Trump to turn Breitbart into his own fan website — using it to hype his political prospects and attack his enemies," BuzzFeed News reported in August 2015. Breitbart editors and writers alleged the company had a financial arrangement with Trump, according to BuzzFeed.

Classy, all the way. To put this all into perspective, here are a couple of recent articles run on Breitbart. Just to give you an idea of the kinds of things Donald Trump finds to be informative and enjoyable reading. So much so that he hired the guy responsible for them to run his presidential campaign. These - and many other examples - are featured in a Media Matters post called "Breitbart News’ Worst Headlines" (link).

Bill Kristol being a Republican conservative who has shown the unfortunate temerity to criticize the always thin-skinned Donald Trump (link).

These are certainly not the kinds of things you would have found on the resume' of someone running the campaign of a major party presidential candidate in the past. Or at least not in the United States. Then again, we have now boldly entered into a whole new kind of crazy now.

There are people who are very excited by the hiring of Mr. Bannon. One such group of folks can be found on something called Alt Right. They are people who have found sympathy at Breitbart in the past, and are now more than happy to return the favor. Here is how they are described by the news site The Daily Beast (link):

Alt Right Rejoices at Donald Trump’s Steve Bannon Hire: As Breitbart’s chief, Steve Bannon did a lot to normalize the racist, anti-Semitic world of the alt right. Now they rejoice as he joins the campaign of their king.

Donald Trump’s campaign is under new management—and his white nationalist fanboys love it. The campaign’s new chief executive, Stephen Bannon, joins from Breitbart News—where he helped mainstream the ideas of white nationalists and resuscitate the reputations of anti-immigrant fear-mongers.

White nationalists today invest a lot of energy worrying about growing Hispanic and Muslim populations in the U.S. Turns out, Breitbart News spends a lot of time worrying about those things, too. And in Bannon, they see a media-friendly, ethno-nationalist fellow traveler.

“Latterly, Breitbart emerged as a nationalist site and done great stuff on immigration in particular,” editor Peter Brimelow told The Daily Beast.

VDare is a white supremacist site. It’s named after Virginia Dare, the first white child born to British colonists in North America. Brimelow said he and Bannon met briefly last month and exchanged pleasantries about each other’s work.

“It’s irritating because is not used to competition,” Brimelow added. “I presume that is due to Bannon, so his appointment is great news.”

Brimelow isn’t the only prominent white nationalist to praise the Bannon hire. Richard Spencer, who heads the white supremacist think tank National Policy Institute, said he was also pleased. Under Bannon’s leadership, Breitbart has given favorable coverage to the white supremacist Alt Right movement. And Spencer loves it.

Just when you thought this election wasn't scary enough.

Ivanka Trump partying with the Putins
You just can't make this stuff up. This from the gossip site Gawker (link):

So let's see if I have this straight. Wendi Deng is the girlfriend of Vladimir Putin. But she is also the ex-wife of Fox News owner and all-around media empire billionaire Rupert Murdoch? And a dear friend of the Trumps as well?

Amazing. Wendi Deng is a one woman Bilderberg.

One more

Tuesday, August 16, 2016

Sierra Madre City Councilmember John Harabedian's Controversial New Employment Opportunity

I picked up on this article from my Google News feed. I don't know if you are aware, but you can identify any number of topics of interest to you, input them into the easy to use application found there, and should something show up on the Internet somewhere regarding your concern it will appear in your email within a matter of minutes.

Just in case you are wondering how I manage to come across such things. And frankly, this one is quite interesting. It comes from a venerable legal news service called The Los Angeles Journal (link), which apparently has been around from way back in the 1800s. It is a subscription only site, so I am not able to provide you with a direct link to this particular article. But as a service to you, the concerned Sierra Madre resident who needs to know, I am reproducing it here.

All of which sounds somewhat good. After all, who could ever have a problem with helping out po' bucker litigants with potential $100 million dollar lawsuits on their hands? Legal counsel does not come cheap, after all, and you will always need money to make money.

However, and as any close follower of the governmental and legal affairs of this portion of God's greatest land is likely to tell you, larding something over with the familiar language of social concern does not necessary mean that this interesting legal service will limit itself to just the downtrodden and oppressed. Not when there is some of that long green to be made.

After all, isn't it true that when you want to sell people on something in California, the proven way of doing so is to claim it will help make the world a better place? Investors take note.

I was fortunate enough to be able to discuss today's news with someone who knows a lot about this expanding niche legal field, and he enlightened me about some of the claims our guy John Harabedian makes for himself in the above article. The obvious undertone being that he is taking a very lucrative position and spinning it as the embodiment of advanced legal social responsibility.

Here are a few points.

- Harabedian will be salaried and highly paid, but Bentham, the company, operates on the premise that they’re “evening the playing field.” They find cases likely to win, that normally would take too much money and time to litigate, and fund the attorneys working on them, knowing that they, the investment company, will get a cut of the ultimate award.

- It’s very hush hush, you rarely find out which cases they are even involved in, but this company will at least tell you they have a 90% success rate of winning cases, so far they have put money into 180 lawsuits and have gotten back $1.7 billion from their investments.

- The red herring Harabedian flies is that they’re helping fund the cases of average joe’s who have been wronged and can’t afford to litigate their cases. The reality is they only really pick large commercial litigation where the payout is big enough to be worth their while. So two big companies fighting over trade secrets or breach of contract would be an obvious example. Opponents of the practice say it’s flooding the system with frivolous lawsuits.

Harabedian will decide quietly, confidentially, to back this company or that company in its suit, because even if the business in legal trouble is rich and powerful, it can’t put so much of its capital at risk litigating. So he gets big business connections by deciding which corporation gets to have their bill footed in the short term, based on strength of case and wealth of opponent. Part of it is the merits, but who wouldn’t get a better chance at winning with unlimited funds to litigate and appeal? It’s a blank legal check and he’s the new gateway.

- Even if everything stays above board, the more believable story is he’s taking the revolving door special interest business route up the ladder, so it is a time-honored political path. Harabedian is just trying to spin it as something less sinister than what it is.

A press release from Bentham IMF is available on-line and you can link to it here. Note this line: "Clients utilizing Bentham’s funding have retained an average of 63% of all case proceeds."

I guess that leaves 37% for the investors. Operators are now standing by to take your call.

Monday, August 15, 2016

All Kinds of Hell is Now Breaking Loose on Planet Trump

Is Donald refusing to honor America?

Mod: Yesterday's New York Times revelation (link) that $12.7 million in undisclosed cash payments had been made to Darn Old Trump's campaign manager Paul Manafort by pro-Russian Vladimir Putin political party hacks from the Ukraine is blowing up in full technicolor today. Here's a few stories that lay this all out.

Internet freaks after Lewandowski posts Times story on Paul Manafort’s sketchy ties to Ukraine (link): The New York Times dropped a bombshell Sunday night revealing an expose on Donald Trump campaign chair Paul Manafort’s ties to Ukraine.

According to the story, Manafort’s work was consulting for Ukraine’s political party in power. Investigators say the network Manafort is associated with was once used to steal assets and control elections in the country. The ties to Russia and Ukraine came under attack when the FBI found that Russian government hackers were responsible for the hacking of the Democratic National Committee. Interestingly, the DNC staffer who was researching Paul Manafort’s ties to Russia had his personal data targeted.

Their expose “offers new details of how he mixed politics and business out of public view and benefited from powerful interests now under scrutiny by the new government in Kiev.”

“He understood what was happening in Ukraine,” the Times quotes Vitaliy Kasko, a former senior official with the general prosecutor’s office in Kiev. “It would have to be clear to any reasonable person that the Yanukovych clan, when it came to power, was engaged in corruption.”

Adding, “It’s impossible to imagine a person would look at this and think, ‘Everything is all right.’”

Manafort has been doing international consulting since the 1980s, particularly for dictators, including Viktor F. Yanukovych who was removed after an uprising in Ukraine before fleeing to Russia two years ago.

Since leaving, investigators have looked into practices under Yanukovych and found what they called the “black ledger,” a list of names and how much cash was doled out to them. The ledger was in a third-floor room of the Party of Regions headquarters along with two giant safes filled with $100 bills.

“This was our cash,” Taras V. Chornovil, the former party leader told the Times. Though he claims it was the sketchy financial dealings that caused him to leave the party. “They had it on the table, stacks of money, and they had lists of who to pay.”

Over the course of five years, Manafort’s name appears 22 times totaling $12.7 million.

It wasn’t long before Trump loyalist and paid CNN shill Corey Lewandowski tweeted the story. Lewandowski and Manafort were notorious for infighting on the Trump campaign while Lewandowski was at the helm. He’s also spent the last few months, since being fired from the Trump campaign, attacking Manafort in the media, including calling for Manafort’s immediate dismissal after Melania Trump’s plagiarism scandal at the Republican National Convention.

Trump campaign meltdown: Paul Manafort paid off by Russia, Roger Stone attacks Corey Lewandowski (link): In the hours since the New York Times uncovered millions of dollars in illegal secret cash payments made from a Vladimir Putin puppet to Donald Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort, all hell has broken loose within the Trump campaign – and much of it is playing out in public for all to see. One of Trump’s top surrogates is publicly gloating over Manafort’s criminal connections, while another top Trump surrogate is publicly accusing is accusing a fellow Trump surrogate of “working for Hillary Clinton.”

The Trump campaign meltdown began late Sunday evening when the NY Times published the story exposing Manafort’s millions of dollars in hidden illegal payments from Vladimir Putin lackey Viktor Yanukovych. Corey Lewandowski, who had been Trump’s campaign manager until he was fired this spring and replaced with Manafort, tweeted out a link to the article as if to gloat about the fact that his replacement is being taken down by a corruption scandal.

Even as Corey Lewandowski was enjoying his revenge, another Trump surrogate Roger Stone got wind of it and fired back by claiming that Lewandowski was now “working for Hillary Clinton” by way of calling him a traitor. Lewandowski actually works as a commentator on CNN now, and it’s not clear what his on-air approach will be to the Manafort story, as CNN wasn’t broadcasting live news on Sunday evening while the drama was exploding.

Meanwhile Donald Trump himself has had nothing to say about the matter, but he now has several problems. There’s the fact that he may have to fire Paul Manafort due to his illegal financial connections to Russia’s Putin. There’s the fact that Corey Lewandowski appears to be so excited by the downfall of Manafort he’s no longer remaining loyal to Trump. And there’s the fact that Roger Stone is now publicly attacking Lewandowski. It all leads to the question of just who might be running Donald Trump’s campaign by the time the smoke clears tomorrow – if there is indeed anything left of his already dying campaign to salvage.

Clinton campaign responds to shocking revelations about Paul Manafort’s pro-Kremlin ties (link): Clinton campaign press secretary Robby Mook issued a late-night statement on the bombshell in the recent New York Times detailing Donald Trump’s campaign chair Paul Manafort and his questionable dealings in Ukraine.

Mook notes that this comes just before Trump is scheduled to give a major foreign policy address Monday on what his strategy will be if he is elected as president.

“We have learned of more troubling connections between Donald Trump’s team and pro-Kremlin elements in Ukraine,” Mook said in the statement. “Given the pro-Putin policy stances adopted by Donald Trump and the recent Russian government hacking and disclosure of Democratic Party records, Donald Trump has a responsibility to disclose campaign chair Paul Manafort’s and all other campaign employees’ and advisers’ ties to Russian or pro-Kremlin entities, including whether any of Trump’s employees or advisers are currently representing and or being paid by them.”

Trump made news just two weeks ago when he told ABC News that Putin is “not going into Ukraine,” seemingly unaware Putin already had annexed Crimea.

Trump also called on Russia to hack Clinton’s server just prior to the Democratic National Convention. “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you find the 33,000 emails that are missing,” he said. “I think you’ll be rewarded mightily by our press!”

He was later denounced by an ex-CIA official who questioned the Republican Party candidate’s patriotism, called treasonous and faced backlash from his own party. Much like the recent “joke” about President Obama being the founder of ISIS, Trump later said that he was being “sarcastic” about the request. Like with the latest claim of “sarcasm,” the press didn’t understand Trump’s “joke” then either.

Mod: Here is my question. Can you support Donald Trump and still claim to be a patriot?

Saturday, August 13, 2016

What is Donald Trump's connection to Vladimir Putin?

Another interesting video has turned up, and I am anxious to share it with you today.

To view this video about Putin's apricot colored genius click here.

One more. After all, it is the weekend.

Video? Click here.

After watching these two videos, can you say with certainty that Donald Trump has not betrayed this country and its people? Can it be the GOP nominated an actual traitor?

Friday, August 12, 2016

Interesting Video

Link here.

Sunday, August 7, 2016

Megan Corinne Sterling, 34, of Sierra Madre.

I actually knew Megan Sterling. The Sierra Madre connection was just a coincidence. She worked inside sales for the Anaheim Ducks hockey team and was my source for tickets to their games a few years back. My kids were big hockey fans at that time and she hooked us up with some good seats despite the fact that we were not season ticket holders. Very sad to see her name show up in a story like this one (link).

Thursday, July 28, 2016

It's Vacation Time For The Tattler

As the world descends into chaos, I figured it was as good a time as any to put The Tattler on vacation. Once a year is enough, and that time is now. Should be back up and running around August 7. Try and stay cool and I will see you then.

Wednesday, July 27, 2016

You Can Watch Last Night's City Council Meeting Here!

Link here and you can be viewer no. 18!

People have been asking what happened at last night's City Council meeting, so here you go. Two precious hours of scintillating viewing, available on The Tattler way before it will be on the City of Sierra Madre website. So you know, the July 12th City Council meeting video is not yet available there either (link), but never you fear. If you have a hankering to live dangerously near the cusp of an unthinkable cosmic reality as it looked two weeks back, you can click here for that as well. 

Which leads us to the topic of community communication. While we just did here for free something that the City of Sierra Madre would likely need $10s of thousands of dollars to achieve (repost a video already available on YouTube), that doesn't mean they cannot communicate. The City Council did so last night, and they didn't spend a lot of money doing it. 

Talk is still cheap, even at City Hall.

The big question last night was about spending a couple ten grand to stick two poles into the ground somewhere near Lima so that informational banners can be stretched across Sierra Madre Boulevard. These banners would then inform concerned Sierra Madre residents driving by of the latest exciting events in town. 

Or at least those events City Hall wants you to know about. I remember last spring Earl Richey wanted to pay the city to put up a banner on the two poles located near Kersting Court. The intent being to inform the residents that many of the claims being made for Measure UUT were vast crocks of municipal merde. Naturally he was turned down. 

Which might bring up the question of a government monopoly on information in town. Something that could be the real motive here. The city does not enjoy competition when it comes to news and whatnot, and the search for ways to control all of that is apparently an endless one. 

But they really shouldn't worry. Chances are that case of Civility Paralysis (a condition also known as CP) many share will not allow them to think too much about that sort of thing anyway. And we won't bring up anything like that here. Far be it from The Tattler to cross that psychological chasm with you today. Or at any time for that matter. We are hardly psychological miracle workers here.

Long story longer, that two poles for $25,000 community communication gambit was turned down. Too embarrassing even for this City Council seeing how it wasn't all that long ago they were postcard pimping for a utility tax increase. And with that new more robust parcel tax they're going to start trotting out this fall, public perception is everything. 

The two year tax increase cycle must always be properly nurtured and maintained. It is a process, after all.

That $95,000 a year new City Hall hire to run the two poles in the ground initiative didn't happen, either. No poles, no job apparently. Mercifully it didn't even come up.

Other things happened last night as well. They filled the empty slot on the Planning Commission. One of the big house boys got it. They also selected someone to assume a seat somewhere in the vast library volunteer bureaucracy. Somebody with fund raising experience we were told. 

But you can watch all that on the video we have so thoughtfully provided above.

Me? I am going to sleep. I have work in the morning. As always, it is later than you think.

Tuesday, July 26, 2016

Banner Poles At Lima: Doesn't This Look A Bit Familiar?

The city that howled about its financial woes before Measure UUT was passed now wants to spend a whole lot of money on something called banner poles. Kind of in the vein of the generic saccharine nonsense being concocted for Kersting Court Park, it apparently is part of the current move to turn Sierra Madre's delightfully organic downtown into something that looks just like everywhere else. Which makes sense since the people responsible for this come from everywhere else.

There is an item to be discussed this evening that deals with City Hall's need to communicate with a community that often ignores them. And rather than trying to get folks attention by producing information that is relevant or entertaining, they instead are focusing on the hardware of communication. Which, as we should all know, can be futile. It is never the paper or the billboard, but rather the words that each contain. If people don't find your content to be interesting or relevant to them, it really won't matter where you put it.

Here is how a portion of this agenda item for tonight's City Council meeting reads (link). The following details all of the ways the city communicates with its residents.

You would think that would all be enough. But apparently not. Here is the paragraph dealing with the storied history of banner poles, and why spending $26,000 to get them would be fine and dandy.

The reason these banner poles were not accepted by the City Council way back when is they were a part of the 2006 Downtown Specific Plan. The very same sopping bucket of architectural processed cheese so unceremoniously dumped by the voters when they passed Measure V. That sort of thing was very unpopular back then.

Like I said, it was a suggestion that came with the DSP. Part of the make-downtown-extend-to-Lima idea, enlivening that side of town. So “downtown” would not be just Kersting Court and Baldwin, but instead lasts a few blocks longer. More businesses, more money.

That has now already happened, of course. Subway and all those little shops that opened in the block east of Memorial Park are part of it, with the Kensington further extending this theme. The successful bakery on the corner of Lima and the Boulevard, which is always crowded at meal times, the Mexican fast food joint that is also always busy, all of that.

Here is something interesting. Like I said, those banner poles were part of the 2006 DSP. And I still have the maps. Look for the purple arch on the left side of the following graphic.

I am not sure that a city that was so recently screaming poverty in order to get itself a utility tax increase should be spending $26,000 on banner poles. And those are 2006 prices. Who knows what they would cost today.

Of course, those poles wouldn't just take care of themselves. You would need to hire someone to maximize their potential, along with the rest of the communication network.

Good money if you can get it. However, don't get your hopes up too high. It is unlikely that a Sierra Madre resident would be hired.