Saturday, September 15, 2012

The Assistant Director of Communications for the Port of Long Beach Writes The Tattler

A few weeks back I wrote an op-ed piece for the Pasadena Star News/San Gabriel Tribune [click here] regarding the 710 Tunnel. I speculated about a number of related issues, including what could be a source for much of the pressure to build the thing, international pressure from Asian manufacturing zones intent on getting their products from L.A. County's bottlenecked ports and to American markets more efficiently. The idea being that since these countries lend us the trillions of dollars necessary to keep the gravy train going, they could very well be able to exercise some influence on the matter. A theory that I had kind of taken a liking to at the time.

However, much of what I wrote apparently did not sit well with the Assistant Director of Communications for the Port of Long Beach, a gentleman named Art Wong. So much so that he wrote a series of carefully considered e-mails letting his objections be known to me, your selfless daily typer. His passion for his port in these notes is clear, as is his desire to guard their reputations. Here is how Art first made his umbrage evident:

Interesting column in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune on the 710 extension. Especially your line about the ports: "And I certainly don't want this done so that cheaply made imported goods trucked out of the ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles can get to the shelves of big box retailers just a little more efficiently."

Most trucks moving goods from the ports head to distribution facilities in Carson, Ontario, Riverside, along the 710 freeway or the 610. I don't know of any distribution centers in Sierra Madre.

And then from the distribution facilities, the goods are transferred to other trucks that take them to our stores. Like Best Buy in Pasadena and Duarte, or the Home Depot, Target and Walmart stores in Duarte. But of course, those trucks use the 210 and the 605.

I don't imagine you're saying you don't want any (of) those trucks coming near Sierra Madre via the proposed 710 extension or otherwise.

That seemed just a little bit tart, at least in my opinion, and I thought that I needed to reply. Besides, who knows what else the Assistant Director of Communications for the Port of Long Beach might have to say? Obviously we had a live one here.

Interesting note. Explain to me then why Caltrans is pushing for additional lanes on the 710, including those designated as trucks only. If they are all using the 610, why would those extra lanes, or for that matter, a tunnel through Pasadena, be required?

Walmart has 12 distribution points in California alone. Woodland, Apple Valley, Hanford, Porterville, and Red Bluff could all conceivably be serviced by port traffic that would make use of a 710 tunnel. I believe that much of the traffic out of our two ports goes to other states as well.

The San Gabriel Valley is a real valley. It would fill up with the effluence of your many trucks should they somehow make use of a 710/210 connector. It is estimated by people who actually think rather than merely react to newspaper op-ed pieces that an additional 900,000 vehicles daily would be funneled onto the 210. A portion of that diesel trucks out of the Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles.

Enjoy your weekend.

Art reacted reasonably to my note, and took some pains to further explain his position. He also apologized for the slightly indecorous tone of his first e-mail, which shows that he values civility.

Let me begin by apologizing for my snippiness in my early email. You're welcome to your opinions.

There are two separate 710 projects. The 710 improvement project with the truck lanes goes from the ports only as far north as the 60 freeway. The extension through South Pasadena is something else. That began in the 1960s before the ports began moving lots of cargo. We're not involved, but I can only assume, it continues to be talked about to handle commuter traffic, like the cars spilling in Alhambra.

While the ports are involved in (the) project to improve the 710 south of the 60. The ports are not involved in the project through South Pasadena.

As for where the distribution centers will go, I live in the San Gabriel Valley. And the 210 has too many homes. And not the big undeveloped areas like Ontario, San Bernardino, and Riverside, which are filling up with warehouses. As far as I know, the regional plans are to funnel warehousing toward the Inland Empire.

However, even if the port-related trucks move throughout the region, we have enacted programs requiring trucking companies that work in the ports to use only clean, least polluting vehicles. Since 2008, the entire port-serving truck fleet has been replaced - all 11,000 vehicles - with 2007 or newer trucks that are 90% cleaner than older trucks.

That all seemed a little too pat for my tastes, so I thought I should continue the conversation. Here is what I wrote:

Just because these truck lanes only go to the 60 does not mean all of the trucks will exit at the 60. And with the 710 tunnel completed they would be even less likely to do so. I believe the diamond lanes end there as well.

I didn't say that the ports were involved in the 710 tunnel. However, the vast quantities of products that pass through those 2 ports are shipped all over the United States. Not just to the few locales you described in your first message. And certainly not to just the Inland Empire, though you certainly can get there on the 210.

I don't believe in green trucks. That, to me, is an oxymoron. There are few products today that don't describe themselves as green. Coal is green, condo developments are green, Caltrans even claimed that expanding the 710 to include more lanes would make the air cleaner. These are the kinds of things that people actually say. Even so-called clean trucks will age in time, and then they won't be so green anymore.

There are no exits in any of the plans for the 710 tunnel. It is for pass through traffic only. It is designed for things that are not stopping here. Like trucks taking products from the ports to Nevada, Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas and beyond.

Art didn't waste much time, or effort, replying to the points I made.

I'm not defending the tunnel or any 710 extension through South Pasadena. But it just isn't clear that it would be widely used by port trucks.

I sent Art an equally pithy reply:

Well, if very few trucks travel the surface streets of Pasadena to get to the 210 now, it is conceivable that more truck traffic would be going through that area when the tunnel is in place, right?

The Assistant Director of Communications for the Port of Long Beach, Art Wong, issued one more reply. In his opinion trucking out of his port would not contribute very much to 710 tunnel traffic.

I distinguish between the "port" trucking and the trucking that Southern California would need even without the ports. if you're saying that the tunnel would attract some truck traffic, of course. The tunnel/210 would be an alternative to the 10 and 60 going east, and in other directions, too.

It just isn't clear that a lot of those would be "port" trucks.

This is pretty much where the exchange broke off. I decided it would be futile to continue, and did not reply. It had become obvious Art wasn't much interested in talking about anything beyond that whatever is going to happen, it won't be the fault of the Port of Long Beach. Which is, I suppose, what they pay him to do.

Bob Matheson didn't support my candidacy for City Council in 2010

There is quite a series of letters written during the 2010 City Council election cycle to be found on Rooster Coburn's Sierra Madre News.net website [click here]. Not in the new version of the site, but in that part now designated as an "archive." And in amongst the fray is the following note from someone who would later go on to become one of our little city's more notorious residents.

(3/27/10) Hats off to (name deleted) for so accurately describing our town's Bully Pulpit! Two generations ago, "bully" was an adjective used to describe superb/wonderful. Now it describes some of our elected officials, they're arrogant bullies on the pulpit that is our City Council!

Remember when elected officials served as "humble servants" of their constituents? Well, there's nothing humble about the outrageous behavior exhibited in Council chambers by certain, seated members. Watch some of the meetings!! It's not difficult to identify the culprits, their demeanor is as embarrassing as it is inappropriate.

Now we have a clear choice in Sierra Madre, and a chance to clear the air (of) the foul behavior that has tainted the civility of our City Council. Voters can reject others of this ilk and elect three candidates who, I know, will put responsibility before rhetoric and character before character assassination.

I'm voting for Moran, Mosca and Walsh. Thank you all for running, and for giving us a chance to save Sierra Madre.

Bob Matheson
Sierra Madre

I wonder if Bob Matheson would consider coercing underaged boys into posing naked for the camera, or engaging in filmed sexual acts with older men for that matter, to be a form of bullying?

http://sierramadretattler.blogspot.com

52 comments:

  1. I love it: "foul behavior that has tainted the civility of our city council." This is kind of like that senator/congressman who railed against homosexuality and was then caught in the mens' restroom at an airport in an unusually "wide stance."

    ReplyDelete
  2. Matheson wrote some similar letters that were printed in the Sierra Madre Weekly. He really has become the poster boy for what is left of the Civility Council.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Matheson is the perfect representative of the Civility Party - all nice on the surface, and something very different going on underneath.
    And, a question for the police, is he registered as a sex offender yet?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Josh didn't know Bob. He said so.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It looks like Mr. Wong spends his time finding bad press about his port, and then defending it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He seemed unduly sensitive about the 710 tunnel. A kind of backhand confession that it is a bad thing.

      Delete
  6. I guess this guy Wong is doing all this counter PR out of the goodness of his heart.
    Anyone with a few synapsis still firing can see thru this guy, since his argument is pretty transparent.
    The trucks WILL bypass the 10 because it will be more economical in time and fuel costs.
    I guess he thinks we all are morons.
    How insulting.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But it is not the fault of the Port of Long Beach! Somebody else did it.

      Delete
  7. John, you would have been a terrific councilmember.
    It confirms my opinion about the absurdity of the segment of Sierra Madre that thinks a good photoshopped picture is worth voting for.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Well ya know, as ole Josh Moran says "$20,000 will buy you a city council seat".
    All you have to do is look at who we have elected, Moran, Walsh, Mosca.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Those people are about as civil as a snake pit. And look at who their friends were.

      Delete
    2. $20,000 got Harabedian a seat, too.

      Delete
    3. What I would like to know is how in the hell can a seat on our city council be worth that kind of money? Unless they are crooks?
      Yes, that must be it.

      Delete
    4. A young man hoping to have a fulfilling political career has to start somewhere. Best to reduce the risk involved in an electoral process and just purchase a seat. Much safer that way.

      Delete
    5. Especially if the money used for the purchase wasn't his!

      Delete
  9. It is very well known that Matheson was part of the slimy group of Joe Mosca's local groupies who slandered MaryAnn in that election, even though at the time she was not even running for the office.
    I hope all of you in that group are proud of Matheson, and Mosca for that matter.
    To quote a woman in the canyon who wrote a HATE MAIL to MaryAnn...."you are a disgrace to Sierra Madre" All of you Mosca/Matheson pals should be shunned.
    You are very bad people, you all are a disgrace to Sierra Madre and a disgrace to decent people everywhere.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Where is Joe? Elected to a 4 year term, and for reasons that still are not clear left the country before serving even half of it. This is a story that needs finishing.

      Delete
    2. The answer to Mosca's disappearance is simple. Being connected to Matheson he found it in his best interest to relocate as quick as possible.

      Delete
    3. Not a Mosca supporter but in the interested of fairness and truth, Mosca announced his departure weeks before Matheson was arrested. No obvious connection unless you are willing to speculate that the DHS was watching him and had alerted Bossee's. Somehow I don't think Mosca was that well connected. More likely he was in a snit because he couldn't get the Dems to back him instead of Holden. Joe had simply reached his level of incompetency.

      Delete
    4. I think Mosca had been fed a line by a bunch of big Dems that he was the chosen one, and that when an Assembly seat became available, it would be his for the asking. When it became obvious that the big boys were going with the Hahn-Holden machine candidate, and a member of the royal family no less, Joe's little world came crashing down around his big ears and all he wanted to do was run away. That said, I doubt that this is how a many of the people here in town see it. And I think 8:55's opinion is more widely held than some people would care to admit.

      Delete
    5. I heard that Mosca was excited that Koerber won that seat. Especially after Joe donated money to Braudrick.

      Delete
    6. Just another unintended consequence for Cut and Run Joe. He also endorsed poor Gene Goss. Another candidate the voters didn't exactly flock to.

      Delete
  10. The Assistant Director of Communications for the Port of Long Beach.

    Your tax dollars at work.

    ReplyDelete
  11. You now have the Port Authority pissed off at you. Great job.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is no one left in the San Gabriel Valley to annoy. I need to find new horizons.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    3. Naughty, naughty.

      Delete
    4. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    5. Please! You are tiresome.

      Delete
    6. I could hear 10:06's little feet stamping from here.

      Delete
    7. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    8. See how they treat me?

      Delete
    9. I hate to see a lack of civility like that.

      Delete
    10. In Moranistan, that is civility.

      Delete
  12. I would have more respect for Wrong Wong if he didn't treat us like idiots, and was just a little bit more honest....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He writes with the assurance of a bureaucrat that rarely, if ever, steps out of the echo chamber.

      Delete
  13. Is it just me or do others see a connection between imported goods from China coming to America and a spokesperson named Wong lobbying for the goodness of it all? Sort of like the Russian SCOGy pushing blocks of stack and packs.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I do declare that since a certain local group of newsies returned from their annual desert excursion the number of comments removed by a blog administrator has escalated!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Brain bake. Too much sunshine has made them cranky.

      Delete
    2. The same gang that was Mosca groupies.

      Delete
  15. Your argument against the 710 tunnel is sophomoric, at best. You do understand the logistics of the Alameda Corridor rail trench and the soon to be constructed Alameda Corridor East going through south San Gabriel Valley, right?...you do understand this?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. OK, Snooty Choo Choo. Then why build the tunnel?

      Delete
    2. Snooty Chop Choo has no answer to that one I guess.

      Delete
  16. WOW, I just wondered something, how many of the past council members have let Matheson alone with their son's? Oh this is a horrible thought but it sure does explain some unanswered questions. I won't go any further as the thought is revoltingly discusting. There has been some realy dirty things going on in our town and it's time to do the laundry. Pass the Tide "Tattler" please.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The thing about old Bob being a skilled cameraman is that he could have been getting pictures of kids all over town, at all of our holiday celebrations, at the pool, anywhere.

      Delete
    2. Thanks to the City of Sierra Madre's laxness in registering Bob as a sex offender he still has the freedom to enjoy his avocation.

      Delete
    3. But at least now people are better informed of what they're getting into. Prior to his arrest, there were unsuspecting victims in this.

      Delete
    4. I'm sure most parents are aware of this vile pervert living in our town.
      I just pray that none of our children were his victims before we knew.

      Just terrible.

      Delete
    5. Whatever happened to the "police investigation" to see if any of Sierra Madre's children were harmed?

      Delete
    6. Police investigations in Sierra Madre usually go on forever. Once upon a time it would have been said that a case was unsolved, but that is not how it is done now. Today it would be considered " still under investigation" and therefore the SMPD can't talk about it. There are very few cases here that ever get talked about.

      Delete
    7. That is true. When is the last time you heard the SMPD mention Mother Moo's cow?

      Delete
  17. I love it that Art Wong says he lives in the San Gabriel Valley and the 210 has too many houses. I wonder if he has heard about RHNA numbers and how they affect his San Gabriel Valley.

    ReplyDelete