As a note, please pay special attention to Agenda Item #3. We have uncovered some new information regarding our current City Attorney, Teresa Highsmith, and it requires your attention.
The first of two City Council meetings this month kicks off with some behind the scenes stuff. The reason for this is it involves legal issues, usually lawsuits, and until these matters are fully resolved it's a secret. This closed session item deals with someone who is in the process of getting fired from their posh Sierra Madre job. Something that surely must be keeping them up late at night. The applicable Government Code Section here is #54957, which you can read all about by clicking here.
Once the closed session has ended, and the City employee in question is fired and soon will be facing a life on the streets with no immediate way of making a living, the doors to the Council Chambers will fly open and citizens will stream into the room, anxious to play their part in our City's democracy. It is at this time that the rituals will be performed, and the room cleansed through the sacrifice of an organically raised free range chicken. The chicken's magic bones will then be rattled until all of the evil spirits have returned to their lairs high up in the foothills.
The first order of public business is the big spend. Every meeting has a big spend, with the dollar amount for Consent Calendar Item 1a tonight being a chunkalicious $639,000.00. Not bad for a little town. $14,811.76 is for the Library, and $304,672 is for payroll. All of God's children do have to eat. Which leaves $319,375 for paying the bills. There is one jumbo check going out, $155,768 for something called the City Master Lease Program. Colantuono & Levin get nearly $25,000 for their legal advice, and $113.15 is to cover the cost of hand sanitizer for the sewer truck. While I understand the importance of this, that does seem like a lot for soap. Even the special kind.
Item 1B deals with the British Home's ambitious expansion program. City Hall is anxious for this to happen, and the City Council seems likely to concur. The size of a sign planned for this location came up the last time this was discussed, so I am assuming that was handled and we will be let in on the excitement tonight. As we discussed somewhere else, the needs of those who have gone past the time in their lives when they can care for themselves is the one profitable business model that is experiencing strong growth in our town. Between this and the ALF you have to wonder where - or if - it is ever going to end.
Item 1C is an amendment to the Wildan Contract. Wildan being the company that has taken on the responsibility of doing plan checks, building inspections, and assorted safety services for our not so full service city. This one has to do with them receiving lower compensation for their work on the gargantuan Kensington project. A one-off situation that is assured of approval tonight.
Item 1D is a bit of a caution. Granulated Activated Carbon is an essential ingredient for keeping our water clean and healthful. The term used for what it cleans out of our water is Volatile Organic Compounds. I think I work with a couple of those, though they are located back east. The cost is $84,900 per the winning bid from the Carbon Activated Corporation. Congratulations CAP!
Item 1E deals with the final tract map for the construction of 5 condos to be built on a couple of patches of dirt at the corner of East Sierra Madre Boulevard and Sierra Place. There certainly is going to be a lot of construction starting up on Sierra Madre Boulevard in the next couple of months.
Item 1F deals with the City's burning need to buy a lot of water meters from a company called Aqua Metrics. City Staff needs an additional $20,000 to achieve this lofty goal, with the total spend coming to $45,000. Personally I don't see why the Water Department doesn't just buy these meters as they need them. But perhaps the sight of a storage area filled with shiny new meters is something that will help boost the department's morale.
Agenda Item #2 is a report from The Ferguson Group, our intrepid lobbyists in Washington DC. It comes with a cover that has a large photo of the House of Representatives, also known to lobbyist types as "The Honey Pot." What they have brought home to We The Clients is some Federal funding for water infrastructure projects. That is not detailed in this report however, so I'm assuming we will hear all about it soon. There is one troubling aspect to all of this, however. In the Ferguson Report there is the following sentence: "The package is being negotiated by House Appropriations Chairman Hal Rogers (R-KY) and Senate Appropriations Chairman Daniel Inouye (D-HI)." Sadly, Inouye passed away last December, and as far as I know had to give up his Senate seat because of this.
Agenda Item #3 is the highlight of the evening as it will deal with who is going to be our next City Attorney. Currently we are suffering beneath the iron fist of a California League of Cities front organization still known as Colantuono & Levin, author of some of Sierra Madre's worst legal disasters over the years. The other law firm still in the running, Richards, Watson & Gershon, has been the recipient of some admiration here for it's legal acumen and long experience dealing with the sorts of problems we face here in Sierra Madre.
The Tattler has been researching the matter, and we have come up with some rather troubling information regarding our current C&L attorney, Terri (AKA Teresa, AKA T-Money) Highsmith. This from a Jan 15, 2011 San Francisco Chronicle report entitled "Alameda City attorney wants new job plus old one" (click here).
What do breezy, bayside Alameda and arid, landlocked Barstow have in common? Nothing. Except their city attorney. Alameda's city attorney, Teresa Highsmith, took a job as city attorney in Barstow on Dec. 20 without quitting her six-figure-salary job in Alameda. Soon Highsmith will be collecting two paychecks.
"We were blindsided," said Alameda City Councilwoman Lena Tam. "We're not sure what happened. Right now we're still in a fact-finding mode." A week after Barstow approved Highsmith for the job, the Alameda City Council voted unanimously to put Highsmith on paid, indefinite administrative leave. The council did not say why. She earns $191,568 plus benefits in Alameda, where she's worked for 13 years.
In Barstow, where she will be paid by the hour, her pay is officially confidential because she's working for a private firm, Colantuono & Levin, that contracts with the city to provide legal services. But, according to Barstow's 2011 budget, the city plans to spend $160,000 on city attorney services.
Highsmith, 55, a resident of Clayton, said that nothing in her contract with Alameda prevents her from working for two cities. Her contract, she said, allows her to work 10 hours a month, on her own time, on other jobs. She intended to work part time for Barstow and full time for Alameda at least through April, and then leave Alameda and begin collecting public-employee retirement benefits, she said.
'I am not resigning' Highsmith said the Alameda City Council unfairly put her on leave and has not given her a chance to explain. "I am still the city attorney of Alameda. I am not resigning," she said. "Ideally, I'd like the city and (Mayor) Marie Gilmore to take the high road and handle this with grace and dignity."
As of Friday, Highsmith had not yet done any work for Barstow or collected any money from Colantuono & Levin, she said. Her contract with Alameda expires in June 2012. If the city terminates her before then, she plans to ask for six months' severance pay and six months' notice, totaling a year's salary, she said.
This is not the first time Highsmith has worked with Colantuono & Levin, a firm with offices in Los Angeles and Grass Valley (Nevada County) that specializes in municipal law. As city attorney in Alameda, she paid the firm $60,000 to investigate Tam over alleged leaks to a developer that planned to build housing at the former Naval Air Station.
The Alameda County district attorney declined to pursue action against Tam. Tam was re-elected in November, the second-highest vote-getter in the at-large council race. Tam then presented the city with a bill for $44,000 to cover her legal expenses. If the city reimburses her, the incident will have cost the financially strapped city $104,000.
I'm not certain that this episode is the kind of thing that will instill any much needed confidence in the abilities of Ms. Highsmith. And then there is an article from Blogging Bayport Alameda titled "Don't Leave Me High" (click here). Apparently Terri is not above suing a City that employs her if she feels there is something in it.
Folks this must be the “high road” that Teresa (Terri) Highsmith was referring to in her interview with the SF Chronicle. That’s right, as mentioned by Kate Quick last night, emails were abuzzing yesterday evening with news that Terri Highsmith, our current City Attorney and the Interim City Attorney of record for the city of Barstow has decided to follow in the footsteps of Ann Marie Gallant and file a damages claim against the City.
Very troubling. There is also the matter of Josh Moran being cited as a reference in T-Money's application to remain our City Attorney. Since that reference could only be of real importance to Josh's 4 colleague's on the City Council, it almost seemed like an invitation to a Brown Act violation. Also, should the Mayor have telegraphed his support for Terri ahead of the City Council's final deliberations on the matter? Nuh uh. It is our opinion that Josh should be asked to recuse himself here. This was hardly an appropriate time for foolish advocacy.
Agenda Item #4 is titled the "Community Budget Survey." This is where the City Staff will attempt to cozen a little cash out of the City Council so that they can employ some on-line tools to help them market UUT and water rate hikes. We covered this fairly exhaustively on Saturday in a post we called "Moving New Product: How the City Wants to Sell You Water and UUT Rate Increases" (click here). If you haven't had the opportunity to read it yet, you may wish to check it out.
Agenda Item #5 is a "Discussion Of A Potential City Utility (Water, Sewer, Storm Drain) Rate Study." As I am certain you are aware, Mayor Josh Moran has cheerfully declared his intention to raise your water rates. This would be the second time water rates will have gone up since Josh was elected to the City Council. The purpose of this agenda item is to lay down some of the foundation necessary for ripping off Sierra Madre's water ratepayers even more than they are now.
Agenda Item #6 is the last chapter in tonight's City Council meeting. It has to do with the lamentable condition of one of our chief water supply resources, the East Raymond Basin. Apparently water levels there are low and getting even lower all the time. Or so the Water Department informs us. There will also be an update from the City Council Water Sub-Committee on these matters. I wouldn't be surprised if this isn't cited as a reason for, you got it, raising water rates.
Live Blog the City Council Meeting!
Tonight we will once again open the blog up for something we have been calling Live Blogging. Blogging is pretty much live here all the time, some days more than others. But what we do for City Council meetings is encourage people to comment on what is going on throughout the evening, and as it happens. This is open to everyone and we hope you will be able to join the fun.
See you tonight!
http://sierramadretattler.blogspot.com

So T-Money is with us, Barstow, and maybe in a suit against Alameda?
ReplyDeleteThe gal definitely needs more time than she's got. And with full retirement benefits from Alameda, I'd say she's sitting pretty. Time to say good-by.
She backs up the gold digging with lawsuits against cities that employ her? Yeah, that is exactly what we're looking for in a city attorney right now.
DeleteDoes she still live in Northern California?
DeleteHow does that work - she flies in every couple of weeks?
At the prices we pay, you'd think we'd be regarded as more than a part-time hustle.
It explains Josh Moran's reference. She must be submitting these things all over California and she forgot to take Josh's name off.
DeleteThe secret life of Teresa Highsmith. Who knew?
DeleteLet's not forget that it was C & L that brought us Scott Porter, the Planning Commission atty that was so very inept that he could not see his way clear to explain suites vs units during the Kensington talks and caused those meetings to go on much longer than necessary. C&L either thought he was doing a fine job or they weren't paying attention. sorry, that's not the kind of representation we pay so much for.
ReplyDeletePart of C&L's three Bs. "Baffle, bunk and bank."
DeleteGood find!!
ReplyDeleteGood God.
ReplyDeleteSomeone needs to remind the City if they use public funds to, for all intents, to campaign for a UUT increase, they are breaking the law.
ReplyDeleteDon't worry, they will wordcraft it to sound like it's not for the intended purpose.
DeleteGood point. Our taxes shouldn't be used as seed money for even larger tax initiatives.
DeleteDoes our vote in this town count for anything anymore? Losing the PUSD vote is bad, but didn't we also vote down an extension of the UUT with Measure U? So now the city is just going to ignore that and start campaign for the UUT extension all over again? And raise it to 12% Even though we voted against that? What is wrong with this picture?
DeleteExcellent point, 8:56. Indeed, we did just have a survey of the entire city with the vote last April, and they voted by 60% NOT to increase the UUT rate. Why should the city now spend more money to "discover" the same thing?
DeleteThe word from the council majority is that you didn't understand, 8:56. If you had the right information, and understood, then you would want the 12% too. The Gang o'Three knows, and will very patiently explain to you the errors of your ways, so your little brain can understand.
DeleteIt is just so degrading to be treated this way.
DeleteIf they are so smart why are they always broke and begging for more?
DeleteThat's how you get more... complain about being broke, scare the holy bejesus out of the taxpapers, and wait for the money to roll in.
DeletePhase one of the strategy was to snooker, uh, convince, all of the committees and commissions of the need for 12%.
DeleteWe need to vote NO on the UUT again in 2014 and let the chips fall where they may. City Hall is like having an old cat you keep taking back to the vet and costs you a fortune. After a while you realize you can no longer afford to keep that old cat alive and you just have to let it go. The city will never stop asking for more. it is time to put an end to it.
DeleteWhat the heck was Moran doing giving Highsmith a recommendation? Didn't either of them consider it wasn't a smart move?
ReplyDeleteWhile it is now clear that Highsmith has plenty of interests of her own, don't forget she's with Colantouno and Levin. They specialize in shadings, greynesses, and skating close to laws.
DeleteNeither one of them is first rate.
DeleteSo this is who C & L brought in to help us out when Levin departed - someone potentially involved in suing the city she was leaving, and leaving with public employee retirement and benefits. Jeez.
ReplyDeleteIt is quite a story. That Alameda blog has some interesting links. This was a major scandal there.
DeleteThey must have thought nobody would figure it out.
DeleteShh! It is a secret. It is bad for you to know.
DeleteWell you might know, but do you understand. Probably not, so they'll gladly help you.
DeleteIt is a con. Our city is run by circus sideshow barkers.
DeleteDid the sitting council of the time know that T-Money was placed on administrative leave?
ReplyDeleteOr did they just say great, thanks Michael and Sandy, for doing all the things for us that you do to push development.
Anyone you want to give us will be dandy.
Interesting point. It could mean that C&L lied to us about the character of Teresa Highsmith. Not the sort of firm you would want to rehire. Especially when we have the option of bringing in a much better firm.
DeleteAdministrative leave from Alameda should have immediately disqualified her from being considered for Sierra Madre.
DeleteWord has it that at least one of our council members likes to live dangerously.
DeleteHiring a litigious city attorney is certainly living dangerously.
Off topic, but it's the Tattler and we don't care. Drove by the Carter development (Thank you Michael Colantuno) and saw gardeners spraying herbicides on the lots. That will get into the drinking water for all of us to the south.
ReplyDeleteFrom a pristine forest to a poisoned empty field. The green legacy of John Buchanan lives on.
DeleteThe one Carter Property Dev. goes back way before John Buchanan . The first project I saw Condos(apt) and a restaurant at the top goes back to early 70s
DeleteThat may be, 1:13, but Buchanan was essential to passing a housing development plan that was so rotten it ended up putting the developer in bankruptcy.
DeleteAnyone ever find out who owns it now? Who Capital Source got to buy it?
Last I heard Carter and Stonehouse were being handled by the 'troubled real estate asset' division of Capital Source Bank. They found a willing buyer?
DeleteThink a pitch like this is in our future?
DeleteDearest of all little cities, you need low and low/mod income housing, we have acres of empty land, how about if we make a deal?
Actually, you can lay the legacy for this at Buchanan's feet (the condos and restaurant program was never anything other than a pie in the sky idea): Buchanan was mayor when the possiblity of a better interpretation (ie protection as open space and all that represents) of the HIllside Ordinance was aborted by giving the go ahead on the Maranantha Housing Development project. Bart Doyle voted, too, along with Joffee and one other councilmember. George Maurer voted NO)
ReplyDeleteMight as well have been Doyle - but it was Stockly. The same guy who worked for a bank that had a financial relationship with the developer - as Michael Colantuono knew.
DeleteThe commercially unviable and environmentally debased status of One Carter can indeed be laid at the feet of the City Council 2:01 identifies. I think Stockley was in on this fiasco as well. Green my tookus.
DeleteAny and everbody in this town has to take some blame for any project on this property . It could have never have happened if we had been proactive and purchased the property like other townes did (Monrovia Hillside). The only way to really stop someone from building on their property is for the city to own it.
ReplyDelete2:13, how about this for a development campaign. We (whoever that is) bought the distressed properties in your hillsides, and one of them has been prepared for development while the other one has not. Let us build whatever and however we want on the one, and we'll give you the other.
ReplyDeleteWhat will you call your development? Winged Pig Estates?
DeleteNu-uh. We'll call it Makingsomebucks Manors. Remember, we give you Stonehouse, you give us Carte Blanche on Carter.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Delete"Take a moment to think about those things."
ReplyDeleteThat's a moment of reflection/inspiration?
It's a moment.
DeleteThink about what?
DeleteThink about the rampage that is going on at Big Bear. And about the President speaking.
DeleteQuite a syzygy.
DeletePutting away chairs is what Sierra Madre is all about.
DeleteActually talking about it at length ("And you even helped put away chairs!") is what Sierra Madre city hall is all about.
DeleteI'm pretty sure any RHNA group to figure out what they've been doing wrong will just be a sales seminar for RHNA.
ReplyDeleteThe cities attending will thank SCAG for their grace and beneficence.
DeletePoor Edison guy just said he'll be there for the duration of the meeting.
ReplyDeleteI don't think he knows what that might mean.
Maybe they pay him by the hour.
DeleteThank you Councilman Koerber for getting the information out that the legal expenses are because of, primarily, the police department.
ReplyDeleteThe SMPD Whine Tax.
DeleteThe Mayor just congratulated staff on seeing a good deal and getting a better price.
ReplyDeleteAs though they are not expected to be doing that all along.
Expectations are low.
DeleteThe murderer Walsh asked us to think about has died.
ReplyDeleteStop thinking, start watching cable news.
DeleteOnce again we are reminded of Harabedian's newness to Sierra Madre politics. He didn't know that a council member who recuses him or herself has to leave the meeting.
ReplyDeleteduh.
UUT collections are up! We're saved, right? Um, probably not.
ReplyDeleteKaryn is reading this like it's the Sierra Madre Stock Market.
ReplyDeleteFreezing positions is a strategy you use when you want to be conservative, but you have money. Eliminating positions is what you do when money is really tight.
ReplyDeleteThe fantasy ends in 2014.
DeleteDrinks are on me.
Delete@7:07. Perhaps the young Harrabedian has figured put how to recuse himself using self induced catatonia.
ReplyDeleteA subtle recusal.
DeleteThe mayor prefers "Rodney Dangerfield's Triple Lindy"
ReplyDeleteHe is a zany guy.
DeleteJosh couldn't let Chris's compliment to the staff go by.
ReplyDeleteBoth Koerber and Capoccia are pleased with staffs work money wise, so I'm going to have some small hope that we won't be immediately bull-dozed.
ReplyDeleteOops! Spoke too soon. Moran just said that 6 out of 10 voters voted the UUT in, in the first place, and more on that later.
Aw heck.
Josh thinks he is entitled to a do over. This is Sierra Madre, of course. The place where votes do not count.
DeleteCapoccia and Koerber believe that the citizens do not want a tax increase; Moran does not.
ReplyDeleteSorry I'm late to the party tonight but I went to the PUSD board meeting. there were 4 folks there from Sierra Madre imploring the board to get on with building the school. It was pointed out that McKinley school received 4 million more for building than they were supposed to get, so how come Sierra Madre isn't approved for a mere1.4million more? Gretchen Vance asked the board to accept the 29 million dollar bid and get this construction underway! we need to keep up the pressure on the board!
ReplyDeleteand now, back to our regular programming.......
Nancy is so silly... She wants to know if the US budget problem will be solved in March!
ReplyDeleteThe unicorns are on the way to save usall.
DeleteGreen Hara going after the green bucks from the EPA....
ReplyDeleteGreen pork.
DeleteOoooo. That can kill a person.
DeleteThe Ferguson group lobbyist is talking so much I can't hear what he's saying.
ReplyDeleteBut I think it's a "No, the EPA money is not for you."
don't eat the green pork!
ReplyDeleteLine of the night from Capoccia - we might as well be buying lottery tickets.
ReplyDeleteMr. Lehman is busy saving his job and fees!
ReplyDeleteCapoccia is making the lobbyist show his persuasive skills, in lieu of getting anything for Sierra Madre.
ReplyDeleteThe party's over ...
DeleteThe lobbyist is telling the council that they need to come and beg for the money. Isn't that what we hire the lobbyists to do?
DeleteSend Nancy. I think Congresswoman Chu deserves to spend an hour with her.
DeleteSend Johnny with his tin cup.
DeleteBack up! Moran just said we'll need to take out loans!
ReplyDeleteAnd he just repeated it.
DeleteWhy not? He has four of them out on his house.
DeleteUh-oh. Harabedian just showed his hand. He's talking about raising water rates.
ReplyDeleteJosh is thanking everyone. will he thank all the little people too?
ReplyDeleteWell, he could always apologize.
DeleteLawyers get too much money.
ReplyDeleteElaine is fighting to make sure that C & L comes off as cheaper - whether they really are or not.
ReplyDeleteThanks to Cappocia for dogging her on this.
Capoccia is making a good argument for RWG!
ReplyDeleteShared billing sounds very good - and RWG emphasized that they would do that.
ReplyDeletego Pat Alcorn! good comments on RWG water expertise!
ReplyDeleteExcellent remarks Mrs. Alcorn! Water team expertise, yes, and Prop 218 screw-ups by C & L, yes.
DeleteJohn!
ReplyDeleteClear, direct and precise.
DeleteThe Mayor should definitely recuse himself.
DeleteWhich City Attorney should he ask?
DeleteHighsmith says she never has sued anyone, and that it was the council that was in the wrong - not her. So the newspaper reports and the quotes from the city must have all been lies.
ReplyDeleteHighsmith left the city because the council was no good.
ReplyDeleteTeresa has denied both being put on administrative leave and having sued Alameda. I guess the newspapers have all lied. Maybe it was a conspiracy.
ReplyDeleteExactly, 13 other cities we can share costs with, if we go with RWG.
ReplyDeleteWalsh is going to willfully ignore all the facts.
ReplyDeleteNancy will do anything for an attorney meal.
ReplyDeleteNancy is concerned with ethics, so she is going to go with Colantuono and Levin. Amazing.
ReplyDeleteYes.
DeleteShe never disappoints.
I guess Colantuono and Levin never did inform the city that Highsmith was on administrative leave from Alameda.
ReplyDeleteIf the rational people lose this one, it won't be without making an admirable case for the wisdom of choosing RWG.
ReplyDeleteSpit it out Harbedian. You're the deciding vote. Don't pull a Buchanan.
ReplyDeleteHarabedian is a sell out.
ReplyDeleteHarabedian is a skunk.
ReplyDeleteso Harabedian thinks that RWG can't learn about Sierra Madre?
ReplyDeleteHe's just got to make up reasons.
DeleteRight - and since C & L has such a high turnover rate, the new people they stick with us get the vast experience of Sierra Madre somehow by a magic kind of osmosis that must happen in the C & L offices.
DeleteProp 218 mishandling? Never happened. Terrible housing plan approved for the hillsides? Never happened. Administrative leave? Never happened.
ReplyDeleteHarabedian doesn't care about shared cost capability.
In Harabedian's short legal career, C&L is one of the best. this is like damning with faint praise. why have a rating system if it's of no value?
ReplyDeleteAh he actually said the rating system was of no value, but that the attorney who was high in the rating was great and deserved it. You have to listen to both mouths when he talks.
DeleteI see why Harbedian had so much financial backing as a starter politician. He can really say two opposite things at once.
ReplyDeleteHarabedian chaneling Mosca - AMAZING AMAZING AMAZING
ReplyDeleteThe fix was always in. The establishment owns 3 members of the City Council, and they get what they want.
ReplyDeleteThat's the truth, but it's hard not to get your hopes up that intelligence will guide the council.
DeleteDamn.
Oh please Josh. Just shut up. Be a gracious winner for goodness sake.
ReplyDeleteMoran is shameless. Saved us from a debacle at One Carter? Good Lord.
ReplyDeleteHis heart belongs to real estate. He probably thinks the Stonewhatevers are good things.
DeleteThank you Councilmembers Capoccia and Koerber. That was a great effort.
ReplyDeleteAgreed. Those two make me proud of Sierra Madre.
DeleteCan RWG challenge Josh's vote?
ReplyDeleteI'm sure they could, but doubt they will. Schooling a little punk from Sierra Madre is probably not high on their list of priorities.
DeleteHere's Walsh arguing to pay more.
ReplyDeleteNancy admits she can't solve problems. truer words were never spoken.
ReplyDeleteCarol Lynch is a class act! she made sure to congratulate Highsmith as soon as the recess was called.
ReplyDeleteAccording to the San Francisco Chronicle, "A week after Barstow approved Highsmith for the job, the Alameda City Council voted unanimously to put Highsmith on paid, indefinite administrative leave."
ReplyDeleteRead more: http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Alameda-city-attorney-wants-new-job-plus-old-one-2478548.php#ixzz2KkfOh43L
water rates. did Bruce Inman bring his rusty pipes with him? and now we need to spend a whole bunch of money on a rate study. why don't folks like Inman do their jobs and figur out how much water ages should be? why do we need the outside consultant for everything?
ReplyDeleteAmen, 9:04.
DeleteIn,an suggests a flat rate. I thought that was illegal per the state of California. at least this is what the Ci mgr has said.I wonder what C&L think?
ReplyDeleteC & L think whatever the council majority want them to think.
DeleteNancy doesn't like small planning. I don't understand, it goes along with her small brain.
ReplyDeleteI don't understand. Josh just said that Inman and Cimino can tell us exactly what we need to do and the cost but that it needs to be validated by a consultant study. why must we spend money on a consultant?
ReplyDeleteThanks to everyone for sending me copies of Teresa Highsmith's lawsuit against Alameda. The one she stood before the City Council and said she didn't file. I will post it for tomorrow morning.
ReplyDeleteTechnically, it's a claim for personal injury, and I don't know if that's the same thing as a law suit. Anyone? And it would be so like a Colantuono and Levin attorney to use the words like that.
DeleteTeresa Highsmith broke a cardinal political rule, if you start a lie don't leave any bodies around to be identified.
ReplyDeleteAnd certainly none that directly link her or him to that lie.
But as everyone has seen in the past, liars or fibbers are not held accountable for their words or deeds.
Oops!
Even with a SmokingGun, I bet Teresa Highsmith will claim memory loss etc. or a evil twin did it, judge for yourself in the following video.
ReplyDeletehttp://blog.sfgate.com/inalameda/2011/03/16/city-attorney-highsmith-threatens-lawsuit-against-alameda/
Great link 9:49.
DeleteHere's a comment from that report:
morelanddrive 8:11 PM on March 16, 2011
All the taxpayers of Alameda did was give Teresa Highsmith a lot of money. What did she do in return?
* Give a $60,000 contract to a law firm, and accept a job from that law firm within 90 days
* Accept the job while still employed as Alameda's full-time City Attorney, without informing the City
* Accept her $200,000+ salary without working
* Insist on keeping her contract while employed elsewhere
* Make a frivolous $25,000 claim with the City, which will either cost the City $25,000 in a claim or $50,000 in legal fees.
Teresa Highsmith fully misunderstands the meaning of "public service." She should be disbarred for her actions.
What a disgraceful city government we have.
DeleteJohnny has never paid a Sierra Madre water bill or UUT in his life.
ReplyDeleteHis mom still washes his underpants.
Delete