Monday, October 7, 2013

Your Tattler October 8th City Council Meeting Preview is Now Ready for Your Consideration

#
The first thing that needs to be pointed out is there will be no water/sewer rate increase "study" by the City Council tomorrow night. This despite it originally being scheduled for an October 8 review. That doesn't mean you will not be able to go to this meeting and complain from the podium about your water rates going up. After all, hitting you with the maximum possible increases in order to float even more financially ruinous water bonds is obviously not in the best interests of the residents of Sierra Madre. The very people whose money would be used to enable this awful idea. But do not expect any of our City Councilmembers to answer anything you might ask about this important matter because it is no longer on the agenda. Their lips are legally sealed.

So what happened? Here is how this is explained in the oftentimes informative City Manager's Report:

You will notice that the draft Water & Sewer Rate Study is not on the October 8th Council agenda. There was not adequate time to turn the report around after Monday night's Special Council meeting. The report will be on the Council's October 22nd agenda.

Loose translation: the consultant wasn't able to cobble together an acceptable approximation of what was said on this topic by the City Council last week, so the death march towards what will probably be that maximum possible water rate increase demanded by City Staff has been bumped for a couple of weeks. It might be the City Council's vote, but it is Elaine and Bruce's love child. The midwife being the consultant.

Now that we have cleared all this up, let's get to what is actually taking place Tuesday evening.

First there is the session that is held behind closed doors because it involves legal matters. Such matters must be spoken of in secret because they usually involve carefully planned legal strategy and lawyer's guile. Things that would not be as effective should the opposition get wind of them before they've been unleashed in a court of law. Or at least that is what I have been told.

However, on the City Council Meeting Agenda a bright light has now broken through, and we finally get to see what this long rumored pending litigation is all about.

Pursuant to Calif. Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) – Pending Litigation The City Council/Agency finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the local agency in the litigation. Case Name: In re Petition of City of Sierra Madre Challenging 2012 Los Angeles Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Permit (Order No. R4-2012-0175) Case Number: State Water Resources Control Board/Office of Chief Counsel Files A-2236(a) through (kk)

And yes, that is a most worthy cause for our city take on. The County of Los Angeles, just like every other other tier in the multi-layered misery that claims to be government in this decrepit state, is hard at work trying to suck even more money out of wee cities like Sierra Madre. A win here could help stop that.

Finally, a cause taken on by the City of Sierra Madre that we can all be proud of.

I have no idea what this next one might be about. But then again, I'm not supposed to know.

Pursuant to Calif. Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4)The City Council finds based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the local agency in the litigation. Initiation of Litigation: Number of potential cases – One

Perhaps they are thinking about suing someone (or something) else, or maybe it is part of the same deal as the item above. The code section is nearly the same.

Here is what that number tells us according to gov. site out of Sacramento (link):

Government Code #54956.9 (d) - For purposes of this section, litigation shall be considered pending when any of the following circumstances exist: (4) Based on existing facts and circumstances, the legislative body of the local agency has decided to initiate or is deciding whether to initiate litigation.

It is safe to assume this means they know something is wrong and the City Council is not very happy about that. Will they now sue somebody over it? Time will tell.

Once these matters are moved along the City Council will emerge from behind closed doors and face a gathering horde of residents, all eager to exercise their democratic rights in a free society. For democracy to work properly an aware and inspired populace is necessary, and Sierra Madre certainly has that. The attendance tomorrow night is expected to be well into the high single digits.

Traditional rituals will then take place, and as soon as the room is cleansed of inappropriate spiritual effluence (and by that I do not mean that small group of we the residents in attendance), the meeting will begin by shifting lots of cash. Always a most momentous event, which is why it has to happen first.

1. CONSENT CALENDAR:
a) ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION No. 13-73 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SIERRA MADRE APPROVING CERTAIN DEMANDS - What's meant by "certain demands" is that City Hall has a lot of bills, and they need to pay them in full view of those whose money is used for this purpose, the taxpayers. This evening the total spend comes to a mere $478,813.76, or the cost of a small home in Sierra Madre a decade or so ago. A relatively modest sum for this bunch.

There are the usual curious spends in the checkbook, however. Colantuono & Levin get $27,872.60 for helping keep the taxpayers safely out of the picture, and First Transit will receive $11,034.47 for driving mostly empty buses around in circles. I am sure there is a metaphor about the modern condition in that. Raftelis Financial Consultants bag a $9,115.00 check for serving as the proactive element in the water rate increase "process," and Pelican Products gets $6 for fixing a flashlight. I just hope it wasn't to change the lightbulb.

b) CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION No. 13-70 ADOPTION OF THE UPDATED CLASSIFICATION PLAN AND SALARY MATRIX - One of my kids' favorite movies is The Matrix. After all, what child has never hoped they were born with special powers that will someday distinguish them from the rest of humanity? My power apparently is typing. But Tuesday's matrix is nothing like that. This one is about allocating grant funds and other moneys to pay for three part-time Community Service Officers.

The silver lining here is that these CSOs will be used (in part) to enforce parking laws in town. This in place of that posse of mercenary rent-a-ticketeers the City was thinking of hiring. Something that has led me to believe that Chief Giannone actually listens to what people in this town have to say. A pleasant surprise to say the least.

c) CONSIDER APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION No. 13-72 APPROPRIATING ADDITIONAL PART-TIME POLICE OFFICER HOURS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013- 2014 AND COMMIT THE ONE- TIME CONTRACT PAYMENT FROM ATHENS SERVICES FOR THE APPROPRIATION - This one kicks off with the following scary paragraph:

Since the inception of realignment (AB 109) in October of 2011 approximately 19,000 prisoners have been released from state prison back to Los Angeles County. Although the City of Sierra Madre does not currently have anyone living in the City that were (sic) released under AB 109, the City has not has not been exempt from the increase in crime by the criminals that are traversing through the City. Residential burglaries are on the rise and staff does not see it slowing down anytime soon.

Apparently the solution to our local crime fear factor is to head on over to the LAPD's famous Police Academy (we've all seen the movies) and hire up some new part-time cops. They will be paid $44.09 an hour (with bennies), which isn't bad money for the working man. And to make this less painful for the fiscal hawks amongst us, City Staff has located a loose and already existing $100,000 in its financial hoardings to make this possible. At least for one year.

But what happens after that $100K is gone? Do we then fire these guys?

This is how government grows in this town. Find a scary problem, locate some temporary money to fix it, then once that is spent just keep the new hires hanging around. I would hope this doesn't happen, and that $100,000 will be used to help pay down this City's $20 million in debt instead.

Besides, if the already in place SMPD can't do something about this crime wave, what is the point of keeping them? We deserve better than that. 53% of our General Fund should buy us something more.

d) APPROVAL OF PURCHASES/SERVICES FOR IN EXCESS OF $25,000 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013-2014 - City Staff can't spend more than $25,000 on something without getting the City Council's approval first. And I have to tell you, listening to Elaine Aguilar try and con them into giving her additional mountains of cash for something or other is always a treat.

What this one deals with is contracts and the big sums of money being paid to fund them. It really is one hell of a list, and you can check it all out by clicking here. For those of you who would rather not (I was once like that), here is a sampling:

Axontech - $200,000 (Computers/web site, etc.)
Bank of New York Western Trust Company - $1,300,000 (Water/CRA bonds)
Colantuono & Levin - $275,000 (Random legal gymnastics)
DCE Planning - $220,000 (Contract for General Plan, which has been extended into 2013)
First Transit - $1,500,000 (Empty buses going nowhere)
Liebert Cassidy Whitmore - $175,000 (Shystering)
Southern California Edison - $700,000 (Intermittent electric service, brightly burning transformers)
Willdan - $240,000 (Plan checks, general snooping, etc.)

The list goes on and on. We are talking about millions of dollars here. Quite an item for a Consent Calendar.

e) CANCELLATION OF SECOND REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER (12/24/2013)

"Twas the night before Christmas and here in our town, 
the Council would be meeting with no one around. 
But rather than do this with nobody there, 
they'll take that night off to show they all care.  
Though some may question the reason for this call,
when the place is always empty, spring summer and fall."

f) RESOLUTION No. 13-71 ACCEPTANCE OF SAFER GRANT INSURANCE BENEFITS FOR VOLUNTEER EMERGENCY RESPONDERS - The Department of Homeland Security bequeathed $2.2 million dollars to the California State Firefighters' Employee Welfare Benefit Corporation, or CSFEWBC in acronymic. A portion of this will be used to help pay insurance benefit costs for our mostly volunteer fire department. It's a good thing.

We are now safely past the Consent Calendar portion of the City Council Meeting Agenda for October 8, 2013. We now move to the main events of tomorrow evening's slug fest.

2. DISCUSSION – CONSIDERATION OF PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE RATE ADJUSTMENT - For once in my life I think that raising fees might be the right thing to do. Not that I believe the reasons for all of those other rate and fee increases foisted upon us this year were correct. City officials struggling to keep obsolete and expensive old school style city government alive in this town get little slack from me. But I do feel that those paying this particular fee should be forced to shell out for more than they do already. Done in the fervent hope that this will cause predatory developers to decide and take their business elsewhere.

Here it is in grammatically correct Danny-speak:

The fees ensure that any new development will fund the expansion or improvement of existing facilities. Further, the Public Facilities Fees represents a method of establishing the appropriate maximum rates to ensure that any new growth and intensification of land use pays their fair share of the cost of improvements related to growth, and in so doing, also ensures that if new development or growth does occur, the costs of that new development is now subsidized by existing development.

Yes. Raise those Public Facilities Fees, and then raise them again. Take the rest of the night to do it. Be extremely thorough.

3. DISCUSSION – OPENGOV ONLINE BUDGET AND FINANCIAL TRANSPARENCY AND DATA VISUALIZATION SOFTWARE - At first I thought this might be a good idea. Certainly we here at The Tattler are all about transparency. After all, that is what gets us all of the fine information we like to write about here on this blog. What this would do is take the City's budget documents and put them on-line so that everyone can see them. Which is fine.

What might concern me if I was making the decisions here is that the company involved, Delphi Transparency of Simi Valley (link), is a privately owned third party operation of unknown origin out to make a few bucks. Who owns them, and what is their deal?

My question is should we be giving Delphi access to our deepest and darkest secrets? What else will they be doing with their "financial transparency and data visualization software?" The sum they are asking is nominal, so why are they so cheap? I really don't know the answers here. Do you? Shouldn't City Hall be doing this already? It could be an interesting conversation.

4. DISCUSSION – UPDATE FROM APRIL 2013, REGARDING PRIORITIZATION OF DELAYED PROJECTS - We will now begin to see a lot of items like both this and Item #6 below. In addition to pushing hard to raise water rates here, City Staff has to also be concerned about how the renewal of our Utility User Taxes, currently at some of the highest levels in the entire State of  California, is going to go when the voters review topic once again in April of 2014.

As you must be aware, the last time the utility tax extension was on the ballot residents overwhelmingly voted to cut UUT rates all the way back down to 6%. My question here is if these delayed projects are so important, and justify sky high utility tax rates, why is nobody saying anything about them? Maybe the delays should become sort of, you know, permanent.

5. DISCUSSION – CONSIDERATION OF ALLOCATION OF GENERAL FUND RESERVES FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS AND/OR NPDES/STORM WATER COMPLIANCE - Apparently the City has $870,761 in "unassigned General Fund reserves," and City Staff is now looking for a way to spend it. There is a list of possible options for the City Council to consider. None of which are suggestions that the money should be used to pay down Sierra Madre's huge debt load.

6. DISCUSSION – EMPLOYEE RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION PLAN: CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION No. 13-68 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AMENDING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF SIERRA MADRE AND THE SIERRA MADRE CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION AND RESOLUTION No. 13-69: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AMENDING THE CITY OF SIERRA MADRE PERSONNEL RULES AND REGULATIONS - This is the other UUT rate renewal related item on this agenda, and it is a rehashing of an old City Hall argument that I have grown extremely tired of hearing.

This is my take. If a full time job with three day weekends and government health and retirement benefits that far surpass what most people in the private sector will ever receive isn't good enough for you, then yes, please go away. I hardly see why I should need to pay exorbitant 10% (or even 12%) utility taxes so that I can help babysit you for the rest of your life.

Here is another thought. If the jobs currently existing at City Hall were put on Craig's List, the line of applicants on interview day would extend from the firehouse all the way down to Michillinda Avenue and beyond into Pasadena. There are a lot of people desperately looking for jobs in this area right now. Maybe we should give them a crack at some of the jobs we're funding downtown. I'm sure there are several thousand displaced workers out there who would be happy to have them.

7. DISCUSSION – MUNICIPAL VOLUNTEER PROGRAM (M.V.P.) - The rumor is that this one could get ugly. When there is dirty work to be done, more often than not it happens late at night. Will Mayor Walsh finally make good on her threat to "take out" some of the hard working and goodhearted volunteers who do so much for this city? All because they happen to think differently than what she is being told is appropriate by her handlers? Will the long knives be out? Stay up for this one.

8. CONSTRUCTION OF GRAYWATER SYSTEMS IN SIERRA MADRE - This is one of the most important items on the agenda for tomorrow evening's meeting. That it was pushed all the way to last by the Mayor speaks volumes about her regards for the residents who cared enough to insist upon this discussion. Extraordinarily petty behavior from someone who once claimed she was elected to serve all of the people of Sierra Madre.

It has become apparent that the only persons Mayor Walsh cares to serve are two retired Mayors and herself.

http://sierramadretattler.blogspot.com

56 comments:

  1. California Government Code 54956.9. (a) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prevent
    a legislative body of a local agency, based on advice of its legal
    counsel, from holding a closed session to confer with, or receive
    advice from, its legal counsel regarding pending litigation when
    discussion in open session concerning those matters would prejudice
    the position of the local agency in the litigation.

    So it's basically stating that there is a pending litigation case against the City of Sierra Madre, and they can't talk about it in an open forum.

    The People of Sierra Madre once again have to pay for theses lawsuits...... how many is this now? Because I lost count!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh man, talk about following the money. A legal history of this little place would give its residents apoplexy. And a lot of people don't realize just how many firms we work with and through.

      Delete
    2. Is this one that NDPES or some acronym like that?
      All the cities are in a dither about it, if so, because it's making them responsible for what comes down their storm water channels.

      Delete
    3. You were close, 1:40. See item 5.

      Delete
  2. Delphi is aptly named. That Greek oracle knew all and dispensed its wisdom in riddles. Sounds like something custom made for City Hall.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, I am sure it is secure. Didn't they tell us it was?

      Delete
    2. Why can't the city just put this info up on their site? Aren't we already paying some huge amount of money to make things like that happen?

      Delete
    3. I doubt there will be any revelations coming to or returning from Delphi.
      The secrets are not available. Ya know, there are 'legal considerations', and it was 'before our time.'

      Delete
  3. Item #7, what is that all about? Nothing in the staff report gives a clue about what Nancy is trying to do. I predict more staff to be added instead of a volunteer coordinating the volunteers, like we need more staff to take Friday and multiple days off.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nancy's not so hidden agenda is to remove De Alcorn from his position and add a paid position to staff. A staff person has been being groomed for over a year. Staff needs more work in order to justify their existence.
      It is a well known fact that she despises many volunteers in the city.

      Delete
    2. It is a control issue. Employees will do as Nancy says. Volunteers will put what they feel are the City's interests first.

      Delete
    3. It is very peculiar behavior on the mayor's part that she goes after volunteers.

      Delete
    4. Ok, 11:33, so she gets her hate on (and the only commonality I can find in her targets is their high level of intelligence) - but why would any other council member allow this to take place? This is beyond a loose cannon.

      Delete
    5. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    6. I can't tell what that item is about either. It's a job description for a job that is being held by a volunteer.

      Delete
  4. The Red Flag mudslide alert has been pulled off of the City's website. Thanks to the Tattler we've been saved!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What color flag does the city use for an alien space invasion?

      Delete
    2. MPT* Tie Green

      Delete
  5. Nah, the red flag warning for high winds has been lifted and Bailey Canyon Park is open again. Santa Anita gate to Chantry remains closed because of the government "shut down".

    ReplyDelete
  6. Does that mean the mudslide danger is over?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Let's hire a mudslife consultant to tell us.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Many people need consultants when their lives get muddy.

      Delete
    2. We have a mudslide of consultants.

      Delete
  8. or mudslide. whatever.

    ReplyDelete
  9. So the consultant hired by city staff did not have enough 'turn around time' - even though almost a week had passed between the Monday night show and tomorrow night's meeting.
    Maybe some of the high school students who are working hard could tell the consultant how much can be accomplished on a weekend.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe the consultant was waiting for the $9,115 check he's going to get tonight.

      Delete
  10. Do you think consultants realize what a poor image they have with residents?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do you think they care? They are making a living. A parasitic one, but a living.

      Delete
    2. Consultants are there to take the heat for rate and tax increases. They take the heat for the City Council.

      Delete
    3. Consultants don't care about public image - just taking advantage of inept city managment - just spinning BS and whatever sticks sticks

      Delete
    4. Any consultant only has to please one person - a city manager who got them the gig.

      Delete
    5. Agenda enforcement. Bamboozle City Councilmembers with vast quantities of arcane and confusing data until they beg for someone to make the decision for them.

      Delete
    6. There is a distinct aversion to plain speech in our city government.

      Delete
  11. Agree that the Community Service Officers are a very good idea. The only problem is that if they are effective, our current Mayor will probably try to get rid of them.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Is the city manager asking the council to approve all of those huge expenses without seeing them again? I just don't understand how such a little city can have such big bills. It's like a hundred thousand dollars is no big deal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. reeks of ineptness doesn' it?

      Delete
    2. It is just a itty bitty consent calendar thing. No big deal whatsoever.

      Delete
  13. I couldn't agree more Tattler with your summary of the employee recruitment.
    So many people, some who live here, would be grateful for those jobs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The entitled few who do so little for so many, and in exchange expect everything.

      Delete
  14. we need more police officers? is this a belated April Fools joke?

    how about the ones we have getting off their rear ends or will the new part time officers actually be qualifed?

    we need the Sheriff's dept - no more glorified rent a cops

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sheriffs is so clearly the way to go. No wonder the council can't figure it out.

      Delete
    2. I don't know that it's a matter of figuring anything out. Rather, the game plan has already been set, and the plan does not include the Sheriffs. It also does not include volunteers pointing out facts and figures that painfully reveal the charade. FWIW, it's happening all over southern California. I was keeping a list for a while and then it got too depressing. But if you want to research it, look for examples of city councils or local officials overruling local citizen committees or action groups. It's called 'governing without consent'.

      Delete
  15. $870,761 in "unassigned General Fund reserves" and this bunch of clowns want to increase our water rates?

    and the PD keeps asking for more and more and more and more and we get less and less and less

    ReplyDelete
  16. John Buchanan certainly did his job for his employer SoCal Edison, we write some massive cks to that company and while he was on the Council for 8 years he did all he could do to keep us subservent to SoCal Edison.

    can everybody spell "s...c....a....m"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes. The alternate spelling is: "d...o...y...l...e"

      Delete
  17. Is today chloramine day?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have been assuming so, and loaded up on bottled water.
      Wish the city would reimburse me for al the bottled water I used on false starts.

      Delete
    2. The City's/Elaine's/Bruce's credibility has taken a severe beating this week - failed water cutover deadlines, misleading, erroneous red flag warnings. So what are we to make of their other prognostications? Like budget predictions?

      Delete
    3. I am not sure how things could get any worse right now.

      Delete
  18. (I posted this in yesterday's blog and decided to repost it now)

    Here's what happens when your staff is off on everyother Friday and you need to take care of an emergency announcement via the internet from your home: punch in Red Flag Alert and do not double check to see that this was the program format that the city instituted when the May mud-debris flow followed the April 7, 2008 Sierra Madre Fire.
    Ouch!
    All in all it is an innocent mistake but it makes the city look stupid. They do enough of that already without adding this!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What is so telling here is the red flag mudslide warning was up all weekend and nobody noticed. People have tuned city hall completely out.

      Delete
  19. To underscore that point--does anybody know why so much air traffic Monday night 9pm-ish? Non-stop for about 20 minutes. Sorry to bring up the mundane, but the geniuses at the City websites are afk I'm sure. Sounds like Apocalypse Now out there.

    ReplyDelete
  20. They seemed to be circling around a back yard long west of Lima and Highland, then they moved up toward Carter and Oak Crest. Think it was an animal siting. Don't call the police when you spot a wild animal. Stay inside, get your pets and kids inside. Never leave pet food outdoors (feed them and remove the food bowls) and put your smelly garbage out early the day of pickup. The media monitors the police scanners and show up making it always worse for the animals. Stay out of their way and don't help them become a nuisance.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Because no one can stand you. Walshy

    ReplyDelete

The Tattler is a moderated blog. Annoying delays when posting comments can happen. Thank you for your patience and understanding.