Thursday, October 22, 2015

Arcadia Weekly: Will Arcadia Taxpayers Dump Their UUT?

-
(Mod: There was a very good Joe Taglieri article on the move to dump the UUT in Arcadia published in the Arcadia Weekly last week. I am reposting it here today. Since the move to do away with utility taxes in Sierra Madre has been the target of some rather questionable tactics by at least two local governmental bodies in Los Angeles County, it is important to see how things are getting done elsewhere. Having a Sierra Madre City Council sponsored ballot initiative to raise the UUT to 10% here, while at the same time the voters would also have the option of doing away with utility taxes altogether, could make for some very interesting political theater. Hopefully the usual cast of democracy averse suspects downtown will allow this to happen. Link to Arcadia Weekly here.) 

Officials Warn of Utility Tax Repeal’s Negative Impact on City Services, Infrastructure

By Joe Taglieri

A ballot initiative that recently qualified for Arcadia’s upcoming election seeks to repeal the city’s utility tax, which officials say if approved will significantly downgrade services and infrastructure improvements. Proponents contend the city is overtaxing residents to cover needlessly high employee salaries and inflated program costs.

Currently the tax, which both residential and commercial utility customers pay each month, adds 7 percent to bills for water, electricity and natural gas and 5 percent for telecommunications.

In a presentation at the city council meeting on Oct. 6, City Manager Dominic Lazzaretto cautioned that repealing the tax would eliminate 12.5 percent of Arcadia’s budget. This would lead to staff reductions and cancel infrastructure improvement projects.

“Collectively, [utility taxes] are the third largest revenue source for the City, generating $7 million dollars … each year, paying for many important services that the City provides to its businesses and residents on a daily basis,” Lazzaretto wrote in a report to the council.

Lawrence Papp, an Arcadia resident for more than 50 years, leads the tax repeal effort.

“There’s too much fat in the city budget,” Papp said in an interview. “There’s too much imprudent spending.”

In addition to what he observed were bloated city employee salaries compared with neighboring San Gabriel Valley communities, Papp, 86, also noted his and other ballot measure supporters’ opposition to what he described as Arcadia’s overly abundant taxpayer-funded civic and social programs.

“We believe that those who benefit should pay for what they receive,” Papp said.

“Taxes are too high … [and] too numerous,” Arcadia resident Domenico Tallerico told council members.

“There’s a tremendous burden on all taxpayers, and even those that don’t pay taxes ultimately will suffer from that burden,” he added.

Noting the Arcadia Police Department’s status as the city’s largest budget expenditure – nearly $20 million for the current fiscal year – resident Yamay Christle suggested the council consider outsourcing law enforcement services to the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department.

An average Arcadian pays a combined total of less than $10 a month in utility taxes, according to Lazzaretto’s report.

Citing feedback from residents, Papp said the average Arcadian family pays between $200 and $1,500 in utility taxes annually.

“This is serious, it couldn’t be more serious,” Mayor Pro Tem Roger Chandler said. “The effect of this measure taking away $7 million is significant.”

In his presentation to the council, Lazzaretto presented two scenarios to account for the 12.5 percent revenue loss if the tax repeal wins voter approval this spring.

Lazzaretto’s first suggestion for dealing with the budget shortfall was to reduce each city department by 12.5 percent. This would result in the loss of 129 employees, including 29 police jobs and 24 positions from the Arcadia Fire Department, in addition to reducing emergency response times and hindering a wide range of public services the city provides through other departments.

As an alternative to slashing the budgets of all departments, the city manager proposed prioritized reductions.

“Based on what is generally accepted as the community’s highest priority – public safety – and the fact that several functions are legally mandated (City Clerk, Treasurer, and Building Official, for instance), it is possible to illustrate how significant the impacts would be on those departments that fall outside of this group,” Lazzaretto’s report explains.

As an “extreme example,” Lazzaretto posited the idea of completely eliminating the library and recreation departments. This would still leave an additional $520,000 in cuts for remaining departments to absorb.

The city manager also warned against eliminating or reducing revenue-generating activities that may result if voters repeal the utility tax.

“Any program or service cuts would need to be cognizant of the potential additional revenue losses that could occur,” his report states. “The same would be true for grants and other non-General Fund revenues that could be impacted if staffing and service levels did not meet minimum requirements.”

Papp contended that repealing the utility tax would attract businesses to the city, thereby increasing sales tax and other revenue streams.

Council members authorized $10,000 for a citywide mail campaign aimed at educating voters on the consequences of repealing the utility tax.

Mayor Gary Kovacic described the forthcoming mailer as “informative, nonpartisan … and factual.”

Levies on utility usage in Arcadia date back to 1970, when the council established a 5 percent surcharge on all four services.

The council adjusted the rate at several points throughout the two ensuing decades.

In 1996, “California voters passed Proposition 218, requiring voter approval for the introduction or increase of taxes, assessments, and certain property-related fees,” Lazzaretto’s report states.

Arcadia voters overwhelmingly approved a measure in 2009 establishing the current utility tax rates amid an intensifying nationwide recession. The ballot initiative “authorized the City Council to adjust the rate as part of the annual budgeting process without voter approval, provided the rate does not exceed the voter-approved maximums,” according to the report.

In 2013 the council reinstated the 7 percent rate for water, gas and electricity as well as the 5 percent tax on telecommunications.

Based on Proposition 218 rules, Papp needed at least 460 signatures of local registered voters to qualify his initiative for the upcoming election. According to the city manager’s report, Papp submitted a petition in August that totaled 558 signatures.

The initiative calling for repeal of the utility tax will appear on Arcadia’s April 12 election ballot.

More on the PUSD Cleveland Elementary Child Molestation Lawsuit

(Mod: The report comes to us from the Pasadena Weekly. Parents at Cleveland Elementary, blown off by the PUSD and its all-white Board of Education for over 8 months, filed a lawsuit to get their complaints heard. Click here for the PW site.)

The families of seven children who say they were sexually molested by a Cleveland Elementary School teacher are suing the Pasadena Unified School District.

The complaint, filed on Oct. 2 in Los Angeles Superior Court, alleges negligence and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

According to City News Service (CNS), the lawsuit claims that the male teacher was presented to the public as a “highly qualified teacher and counselor who would assist the minors with working through academic and personal issues faced.”

Instead, he used his “position of authority and trust over the minors to sexually harass, molest and abuse them,” CNS reported on the allegations.

The teacher has not been charged with a crime and his name has not been revealed. As of Friday, school district officials said they had not seen the lawsuit.

According to CNS, the victims were girls between 9 and 11 years old.

The teacher was placed on paid administrative leave on March 11, after allegations surfaced that he had inappropriately touched a student. The paid suspension came one day before a parent called Pasadena police.

After receiving that and other complaints, Lt. Terysa Rojas said detectives talked to four children. There was no indication that a crime occurred and the teacher was not arrested, Rojas said.

Rojas said they determined it was more like a hug for good work and that the teacher was not alone with the students.

During the investigation, at least 13 children were interviewed four times by patrol officers, detectives, specialists at the Center for Assault Treatment Services (CATS) and the LA County District Attorney’s Office.

“At that time we took the case over to the District Attorney’s Office they did not press charges,” Rojas told the Pasadena Weekly on Monday. “Not only did our detectives interview them, but we also had forensic interviews done by an outside agency. Those interviews were also included in the case file given to the DA.”

According to the lawsuit, the district failed to notice the abuse despite multiple “red flags,” including inappropriate touching of children and the fondling of them “in a sexual manner,” according to the plaintiffs.

sierramadretattler.blogspot.com

24 comments:

  1. Every city should get rid of their UUT and then live within its means. Because the largest budget expenditure for every city are the city employee salaries, benefits and pensions, that is what needs to be cut. And when I say cut, I'm talking about just bringing them into line with what people get paid in the private sector. The ideal that you can retire at 50 or close to that with 90% of your highest salary is absurd. The UUT is all about squeezing more money from cash-strapped taxpayers so that our public "servants" can get paid higher and higher salaries and retire at younger and younger ages.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Couldn't agree more. I'm still surprised that being a clerk for a city somehow evolved into a dream job.

      Delete
    2. Think about this issue with me?
      Citizens will vote down a UUT knowing it will adversely affect services by their local government.
      Imagine how negative the Citizens opinion of local government is when he/she deliberately chooses such a draconian option.
      The smart citizen knows most of the tax money is squandered by the tax collectors and never goes to the claimed good cause -Library/infrastructure/whatever lie they tell to get the tax increase approved.
      So the UUT is just a 'shake down'. Please don't pretend it is anything else.

      Delete
  2. I can't imagine the long suffering residents of Arcadia are too excited about their city government lately.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They qualified to get it on the ballot - that's better than we did! However, I can just hear the slander machine gears winding up, scaring all the new residents about the crime waves, the lack of water, the bad roads that abolishing the UUT will bring - heck, maybe the library! Weeping and wailing.

      Delete
    2. A lot of people working for the City of Arcadia are pulling down six figure compensations. Obviously they have the money and free time to push taxation.

      Delete
    3. Yes, 8:24. Part of the Arcadia campaign to get rid of the UUT needs to show (repeatedly) how much the pensions are costing the city. Not only does the City of Arcadia hae to pay the huge retirement monies but they also need to hire someone to fill the place of the retired person. Therefore, the cit of Arcadia (and every other city, too) is actually paying the salaries of two people to do only one job. I don't know about you, but I don't think this is sustainable.

      Delete
    4. I got a chuckle when Emperor Dominic of Arcadia said they'd have to lay off 24 firefighters. Always gotta say that when the money spigot gets cut down. No UUT!

      Delete
  3. Well said. When will we all learn this and take action.

    ReplyDelete
  4. See what the Arcadia City Council finally did! Adding the Highlands in the historical review, talking about a possible moratorium on demolition permits (better hurry on that one). Looks like they have listened to the people. See the Star News for details.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They had to run John Wuo out of office first. Not exactly the way things are usually done.

      Delete
    2. Still need to get rid of Sho Tay, though.

      Delete
    3. Just wondering, perhaps a blog reader here can help me. Has anyone ever seen Tay ask any intriguing question, or thought provoking statement at a council meeting? He seems completely lost up there. All I've really seen him do is bring up motions to pass the 'consent calander', it seems like that is his expertise. He's also brought up a motion at the wrong time several times, only to be near scolded and properly corrected by Kovacic. Sure hope he's replaced and get some thinker like Kovacic or Beck. What a public display of incompetence!!

      Delete
  5. John Wuo created the quagmire of his decisions and his lies. Residents and the press put a spotlight on it. The real heroes are the folks behind the Highland's lawsuit and the zoning code ballot initiative. Being serious and standing up to the city council got their attention. However, the moneyed interests in Arcadia and their political patsies (Tay and Chandler) are too entrenched for any legislative changes. Real change requires voter action.

    Vote YES to REPEAL the UUT. Vote YES to CHANGE the Zoning Code.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Arcadia was being partially run by organized crime for a while. I am not sure Wuo's exit has completely changed that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The FBI must be having a field day.

      Delete
    2. May now it's only partially organized crime?

      Delete
    3. They're just waiting for the Feds to split and things to get back to normal.

      Delete
  7. Hello Everybody,
    My name is Mrs Sharon Sim. I live in singapore and i am a happy woman today? and i told my self that any lender that rescue my family from our poor situation, i will refer any person that is looking for loan to him, he gave me happiness to me and my family, i was in need of a loan of S$250,000.00 to start my life all over as i am a single mother with 3 kids I met this honest and GOD fearing man loan lender that help me with a loan of S$250,000.00 SG. Dollar, he is a GOD fearing man, if you are in need of loan and you will pay back the loan please contact him tell him that is Mrs Sharon, that refer you to him. contact Dr Purva Pius

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Purva? Is that a derivation Pervert?

      Delete
    2. So Sharon, what's your kickback?

      Delete
    3. Backed by amber mine. And Arcadia developers.

      Delete