But in case you didn't see it, those following the Henry A. Darling house debacle might find the positioning of these two marginally related front page articles interesting, if only in an unfortunate way. I know I wouldn't have placed them together if I was running the paper. Was this done by the weekly paper's publisher intentionally, or is it just one of those unhappy coincidences?
And someone needs to sit down with Vincent Gonzalez and try to find out why it is he believes the owners of the Henry A. Darling house are "very interested in maintaining the historic integrity of the property."
I'm not sure I can quite see it that way. Can you?